David Nugent wrote:
Tofik Suleymanov wrote:
Thank you for brief and altogether extensive explanation of the
case.The thing i wanted to do is to read let's say portions of memory
where .bss and .data block of a running program reside.
is that possible ?
Yes. Debuggers offer
Diomidis Spinellis wrote:
Tofik Suleymanov wrote:
The only way you're going to be able to read another processes
address space is in the kernel.Even a process running as root is not
able to read another process's data.
Incorrect; see this example:
$ sed -e 's/this/that/'
[1] 87345
$ /bin
David Nugent wrote:
Tofik Suleymanov wrote:
Thank you for brief and altogether extensive explanation of the
case.The thing i wanted to do is to read let's say portions of memory
where .bss and .data block of a running program reside.
is that possible ?
Yes. Debuggers offer
Diomidis Spinellis wrote:
Tofik Suleymanov wrote:
Diomidis Spinellis wrote:
Tofik Suleymanov wrote:
The only way you're going to be able to read another processes
address space is in the kernel.Even a process running as root is
not able to read another process's data.
Incorrect; see
David Nugent wrote:
Tofik Suleymanov wrote:
Thank you for brief and altogether extensive explanation of the
case.The thing i wanted to do is to read let's say portions of memory
where .bss and .data block of a running program reside.
is that possible ?
Yes. Debuggers offer
clue would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Tofik Suleymanov
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you for brief and altogether extensive explanation of the case.The
thing i wanted to do is to read let's say portions of memory where .bss
and .data block of a running program reside.
is that possible ?
Sincerely,
Tofik Suleymanov
___
freebsd-stable
Matthew Jacob wrote:
working on it over the next month
Thank you for reply.
Can i help somehow with this issue?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 08:37:54PM +, Tofik Suleymanov wrote:
Hello folks,
HP DL 140 box with freebsd 6.1-PRERELEASE installed:
FreeBSD xxx.xxx.com 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #0: Thu Feb 23
09:23:17 EST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys
Graham Bentley wrote:
Recently swapped out my Sony for a HP DAT and
got this first time in dmesg
(sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): PREVENT ALLOW MEDIUM REMOVAL. CDB: 1e 0 0 0 0 0
(sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error
(sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition
(sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): UNIT ATTENTION
MC wrote:
Hello again
I have another issue on the same box. The bloke who installed FreeBSD 6.0onto
the machine is a linux man. He didn't know about softupdates nor apparently
does
he know yet about option 4 [read only singule user mode] on the bootloader.
Consequently he hasn't set
Sam Leffler wrote:
Tofik Suleymanov wrote:
After cvsuping latest RELENG_6:
make buildworld ( executes fine)
make buildkernel (gives an error - look below)
cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentium3 -Wall -Wredundant-decls
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wpointer-arith
After cvsuping latest RELENG_6:
make buildworld ( executes fine)
make buildkernel (gives an error - look below)
cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentium3 -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99
Ales wrote:
Joao Barros wrote:
You should recompile the nvidia port with the new kernel.
Boot with the driver disabled in the meantime.
On 11/5/05, Ales [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
After upgrade to RELENG_6, buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel,
reboot I got this error. With 5.4
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
Hello, Developers!
Sorry, my english is bad. :(
Patch to IPFW2 for adding restrictions of the traffic with use IPFW
bytes counters.
It include two parts:
* First part is ipfw_bound.patch, this part add ipfw rule options bound
VALUE and check-bound NUM.
Example:
#
Alastair G. Hogge wrote:
Hello,
I get the following for a whole bunch of out dated ports on my system. This is
taken from autoconf, but it's basicly the same for all other ports.
=== Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
=== Extracting for autoconf-2.59_2
= Checksum OK for
Good day Soren,
i've applied ATA mkIII patch on freshly cvsuped 5.4-STABLE and experienced
problems with onboard sata controller.Here is a fragment from dmesg output:
atapci1: nVidia nForce3 Pro SATA150 controller port
0xe000-0xe00f,0xb70-0xb73,0x970-0x977,0xbf0-0xbf3,0x9f0-0x9f7 irq 22 at
Damian Gerow wrote:
Thus spake Soren:
: I've just uploaded the latest ATA mkIII patches for releng_5 (and
: releng_5_4 for that matter).
:
: Since this work is now in -current there will only be releng_5 patches
: now and then if there is sufficient interest.
Since the work was done for
18 matches
Mail list logo
