Quoting "Chris H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi !
> In this context, I believe that it makes more sense to place the
> server related install on the first disc. This makes it possible
> to install a server with the least amount of effort.
Granted.
> It /also/
> makes it quite possible for a would-be
Quoting "Chris H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If you ask me, kernel developer &| server install should be on
> disc1, and desktop^*$ should go on disc99.
>
> FreeBSD
> ...the power to serve.
> ^
eh ?
???
So what do you propose to use as workstations with your FreeBSD servers ?
Quoting "Chris H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> BSD is /different/. Which is /not/ bad, just /different/. :)
Never said it was bad (on the *very* contrary)
Been using it for a little more than 10 years now: would I have been if I had
thought otherwise ? ;-)
> * choose net/cvsup-without-gui
no longer
Quoting Ken Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi !
> On behalf of the FreeBSD Project thanks for your interest in FreeBSD.
> We hope you enjoy the new release.
I've just spent the whole morning installing it on my office desktop.
It was an awful experience: installing packages from the three CDs kept
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> only from backup.
Or from a snapshot ?
(if it's a UFS2 partition, and "snapshooting" has been enabled)
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, se
