Re: /dev/cuad0: Device busy

2008-02-04 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 05:10:20AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > Also, the above mechanism must be fairly old, because I imagine it would > be more effective to utilise kqueue/kevent to inform said programs of > when the serial port is available for use. The kqueue/kevent had appeared only in 4

Re: /dev/cuad0: Device busy

2008-02-04 Thread Mark Andrews
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 02:08:32PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > > Personally, I never understood the concept of "dial-in" and "call-out" > > > devices on FreeBSD. I ran BBS software for years on both Apple II > > > hardware and PC hardware; there was no distinction between such devices. >

Re: /dev/cuad0: Device busy

2008-02-04 Thread Andrew Kolchoogin
> > > Personally, I never understood the concept of "dial-in" and "call-out" > > > devices on FreeBSD. I ran BBS software for years on both Apple II > > > hardware and PC hardware; there was no distinction between such devices. > > > A serial port is a serial port. Chances are I'm not understandi

Re: /dev/cuad0: Device busy

2008-02-04 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 02:08:32PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > > Personally, I never understood the concept of "dial-in" and "call-out" > > devices on FreeBSD. I ran BBS software for years on both Apple II > > hardware and PC hardware; there was no distinction between such devices. > > A seria

Re: /dev/cuad0: Device busy

2008-02-04 Thread Mark Andrews
> > Personally, I never understood the concept of "dial-in" and "call-out" > > devices on FreeBSD. I ran BBS software for years on both Apple II > > hardware and PC hardware; there was no distinction between such devices. > > A serial port is a serial port. Chances are I'm not understanding why

Re: /dev/cuad0: Device busy

2008-02-03 Thread Eugene Grosbein
> Personally, I never understood the concept of "dial-in" and "call-out" > devices on FreeBSD. I ran BBS software for years on both Apple II > hardware and PC hardware; there was no distinction between such devices. > A serial port is a serial port. Chances are I'm not understanding why > there's

Re: /dev/cuad0: Device busy

2008-02-03 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 02:37:31PM +0800, Ganbold wrote: > Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 12:53:58PM +0800, Ganbold wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm trying to use serial port but the system says device busy. >>> >>

Re: /dev/cuad0: Device busy

2008-02-03 Thread Ganbold
Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 12:53:58PM +0800, Ganbold wrote: Hi, I'm trying to use serial port but the system says device busy. daemon# cu -l /dev/cuad0 -s 9600 /dev/cuad0: Device busy link down Does the same happen if you do `cu -l ttyd0 -s 9600`? It

Re: /dev/cuad0: Device busy

2008-02-03 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 12:53:58PM +0800, Ganbold wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to use serial port but the system says device busy. > > daemon# cu -l /dev/cuad0 -s 9600 > /dev/cuad0: Device busy > link down Does the same happen if you do `cu -l ttyd0 -s 9600`? > How

Re: /dev/cuad0: Device busy

2008-02-03 Thread Ganbold
Daniel O'Connor wrote: On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Ganbold wrote: I'm trying to use serial port but the system says device busy. daemon# cu -l /dev/cuad0 -s 9600 /dev/cuad0: Device busy link down What does fstat /dev/cuad0 say? It says: daemon# fstat /dev/cuad0 US

Re: /dev/cuad0: Device busy

2008-02-03 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Ganbold wrote: > I'm trying to use serial port but the system says device busy. > > daemon# cu -l /dev/cuad0 -s 9600 > /dev/cuad0: Device busy > link down What does fstat /dev/cuad0 say? -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer fo

/dev/cuad0: Device busy

2008-02-03 Thread Ganbold
Hi, I'm trying to use serial port but the system says device busy. daemon# cu -l /dev/cuad0 -s 9600 /dev/cuad0: Device busy link down daemon# uname -an FreeBSD daemon.micom.mng.net 7.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Jan 14 16:49:57 ULAT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/us