Re: 5.2 - 5.3 without single mode?

2004-11-28 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] dima [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Is it possible to cvsup from 5.2 to 5.3 without booting in single mode? : I have a remote machine and want update it, but it is no console access, : only SSH. : You don't actually need to reboot in single-user mode. Just

Re: 5.2 - 5.3 without single mode?

2004-11-28 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] dima [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Is it possible to cvsup from 5.2 to 5.3 without booting in single mode? : I have a remote machine and want update it, but it is no console access, : only SSH. : You don't actually need to reboot in

Re: 5.2 - 5.3 without single mode?

2004-11-28 Thread Robert Backhaus
In general, yes, there will be. Quite an extensive one. Usually thoroughly bikeshedded on the lists beforehand. As a rule, always do installkernel before installworld. The new kernel will always run the old world (within reason), although often not vice versa. Then, in case of a failure, it

Re: 5.2 - 5.3 without single mode?

2004-11-28 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : M. Warner Losh wrote: : In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : dima [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : Is it possible to cvsup from 5.2 to 5.3 without booting in single mode? : : I have a remote

5.2 - 5.3 without single mode?

2004-11-25 Thread Sergei
Is it possible to cvsup from 5.2 to 5.3 without booting in single mode? I have a remote machine and want update it, but it is no console access, only SSH. Thanks... ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: 5.2 - 5.3 without single mode?

2004-11-25 Thread dima
Is it possible to cvsup from 5.2 to 5.3 without booting in single mode? I have a remote machine and want update it, but it is no console access, only SSH. You don't actually need to reboot in single-user mode. Just make sure your users wouldn't use the server hard during the # mergemaster -p #