EASE em0 watchdog timeouts -- sometimes (w/ partial workaround) Mike
> Andrews
> * 6.2-RELEASE em0 watchdog timeouts -- sometimes (w/ partial workaround)
> Jack Vogel
> o 6.2-RELEASE em0 watchdog timeouts -- sometimes (w/ partial
> workaround) Mike Andrews
>
On Tuesday 16 January 2007 22:07, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 1/16/07, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:53:04AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > > There are some management related issues with this NIC, first if you
> > > have not done so make a DOS bootable device,
Jack Vogel wrote:
On 1/16/07, Mike Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a strange issue with em0 watchdog timeouts that I think is not the
same as the ones everyone was having during the 6.2 beta cycle...
I have six systems, each with two Intel GigE ports onboard:
Systems A and B: Superm
On 1/16/07, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:53:04AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> There are some management related issues with this NIC, first if you
> have not done so make a DOS bootable device, and run this app I
> am enclosing, it fixes the prom setting tha
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:53:04AM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> There are some management related issues with this NIC, first if you
> have not done so make a DOS bootable device, and run this app I
> am enclosing, it fixes the prom setting that is wrong on some devices.
> It will do no harm, and it
Jack Vogel wrote:
On 1/16/07, Mike Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a strange issue with em0 watchdog timeouts that I think is not the
same as the ones everyone was having during the 6.2 beta cycle...
I have six systems, each with two Intel GigE ports onboard:
Systems A and B: Superm
I have a strange issue with em0 watchdog timeouts that I think is not the
same as the ones everyone was having during the 6.2 beta cycle...
I have six systems, each with two Intel GigE ports onboard:
Systems A and B: Supermicro PDSMi+
Systems C and D: Supermicro PDSMi (without the plus)
System
