Andrew Reilly wrote:
Hello again,
[to recap: drscheme, (which is an IDE that runs under the mred
runtime, built from ports/lang/drscheme (or actually manually
from a personal copy of that Makefile that builds the current
release: 372, rather than ver 370 in ports)) worked beautifully
on my
Hi Marius,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:33:27 +0100
Marius Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The __gthread_active_p(), which returns false positives prior
to the current version of gthr-posix.h, isn't only used in
libstdc++ but also in headers that are installed beneath
/usr/include/c++. So the code
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:44:05AM +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote:
Hello again,
[to recap: drscheme, (which is an IDE that runs under the mred
runtime, built from ports/lang/drscheme (or actually manually
from a personal copy of that Makefile that builds the current
release: 372, rather than
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:10:14PM +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote:
Hi Marius,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:33:27 +0100
Marius Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The __gthread_active_p(), which returns false positives prior
to the current version of gthr-posix.h, isn't only used in
libstdc++ but
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 21:10 +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote:
Hi Marius,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:33:27 +0100
Marius Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The __gthread_active_p(), which returns false positives prior
to the current version of gthr-posix.h, isn't only used in
libstdc++ but also in
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:41:54 -0500
Alexandre \Sunny\ Kovalenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I right to assume that this is *not* i386? I have 7-PRERELEASE (i386)
cvsup'ed on January 22, early morning EST, and mred built from vanilla
372 sources (per your earlier recommendation) on January 8th.
Hello again,
[to recap: drscheme, (which is an IDE that runs under the mred
runtime, built from ports/lang/drscheme (or actually manually
from a personal copy of that Makefile that builds the current
release: 372, rather than ver 370 in ports)) worked beautifully
on my system until I updated to
