Re: 8.0-BETA3 and txp(4) panic: vm_phys_alloc_contig

2009-08-31 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:29:17PM -0400, Jeff Blank wrote: Hi, When booting 8.0-BETA3, whether built from source under 7.2-STABLE or just using the CD (AMD64 disc1), I get a panic and a trip to the debugger. No panic if I remove my 3Com ethernet card (txp). 'pciconf -lv' output is below

8.0-BETA3 and txp(4) panic: vm_phys_alloc_contig

2009-08-31 Thread Jeff Blank
Hi, When booting 8.0-BETA3, whether built from source under 7.2-STABLE or just using the CD (AMD64 disc1), I get a panic and a trip to the debugger. No panic if I remove my 3Com ethernet card (txp). 'pciconf -lv' output is below the boot log. Jeff GDB: no debug ports present KDB: debugger

Re: 8.0-BETA3 and txp(4) panic: vm_phys_alloc_contig

2009-08-31 Thread Jeff Blank
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:49:18AM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: Hmm, this is odd. I can't find where the alignment is not power of 2 in txp_dma_alloc(). Could you show me the line number of txp_attach+0x6f5? What's the command to do this? I thought it might be 'x/A txp_attach+0x65f', but that

Re: 8.0-BETA3 and txp(4) panic: vm_phys_alloc_contig

2009-08-31 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 02:29:10PM -0400, Jeff Blank wrote: On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:49:18AM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: Hmm, this is odd. I can't find where the alignment is not power of 2 in txp_dma_alloc(). Could you show me the line number of txp_attach+0x6f5? What's the command

Re: 8.0-BETA3 and txp(4) panic: vm_phys_alloc_contig

2009-08-31 Thread Jeff Blank
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:29:20PM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: Hmm... never mind. Please try attached patch let me know how it goes. that seemed to do it. I didn't get a chance to test networking at all, as I ran into another (most probably unrelated) panic, but I can at least get past the

Re: 8.0-BETA3 and txp(4) panic: vm_phys_alloc_contig

2009-08-31 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 04:58:50PM -0400, Jeff Blank wrote: On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:29:20PM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: Hmm... never mind. Please try attached patch let me know how it goes. that seemed to do it. I didn't get a chance to test networking at all, as I ran into another