Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1Server

2011-12-15 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: Michael Larabel michael.lara...@phoronix.com I was the on that carried out the testing and know that it was on the same system. All of the testing, including the system tables, is fully automated. Under FreeBSD sometimes the parsing of some component

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1Server

2011-12-15 Thread Michael Larabel
On 12/15/2011 05:02 AM, Steven Hartland wrote: - Original Message - From: Michael Larabel michael.lara...@phoronix.com I was the on that carried out the testing and know that it was on the same system. All of the testing, including the system tables, is fully automated. Under

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1Server

2011-12-15 Thread Gót András
It would be also nice to see whether compiling the kernel and the world for the specific machine counts. I think it's an advantage of FreeBSD, but never could do a benchmark comparing this. Andras 15.12.2011 12:19 napján Michael Larabel ezt írta: On 12/15/2011 05:02 AM, Steven Hartland

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1Server

2011-12-15 Thread Steven Hartland
Having a quick look at those results aren't there a few annomolies e.g. THREADED I/O TESTER for Oracle reports 10255.75MB/s Which is clearly impossible for a single HD system meaning its basically caching the entire data set? Regards Steve

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1Server

2011-12-15 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 15/12/2011 14:29 Steven Hartland said the following: Having a quick look at those results aren't there a few annomolies e.g. THREADED I/O TESTER for Oracle reports 10255.75MB/s Which is clearly impossible for a single HD system meaning its basically caching the entire data set? I think