Xin LI wrote:
We plan to issue an EN to update the base system ntp to 4.2.8p9.
The high impact issue is Windows only by the way.
I don't think I'm even impacted - but $security team are going nuts
about getting patched on all systems :/
Michelle
We plan to issue an EN to update the base system ntp to 4.2.8p9.
The high impact issue is Windows only by the way.
Cheers,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 6:18 PM, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>
>> On 08 Dec 2016, at 06:08, Michelle Sullivan
On 13 Dec 2016, at 03:18, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>
> Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On 08 Dec 2016, at 06:08, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>>> Are we going to get a patch for CVE-2016-7434 on FreeBSD 9.3?
>> On Nov 22, in r309009, Xin Li merged ntp 4.2.8p9, which
Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 08 Dec 2016, at 06:08, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Are we going to get a patch for CVE-2016-7434 on FreeBSD 9.3?
On Nov 22, in r309009, Xin Li merged ntp 4.2.8p9, which fixes this
issue, to stable/9:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/309009
On 08 Dec 2016, at 06:08, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>
> Are we going to get a patch for CVE-2016-7434 on FreeBSD 9.3?
On Nov 22, in r309009, Xin Li merged ntp 4.2.8p9, which fixes this
issue, to stable/9:
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/309009
Unfortunately the
Are we going to get a patch for CVE-2016-7434 on FreeBSD 9.3?
Michelle
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"