Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 07:28:58PM +1000, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
[stuff snipped]
>>
>> I suppose that the crux to the question is - why should the "system"
>> namespace not be available within a jail?
>Perhaps because system namespace (can) carry attributes which modify
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 07:28:58PM +1000, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> On 14/07/2017 5:56 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 01:53:40PM +1000, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> >> Can someone advise how I can enable extended attributes in a "system"
> >> namespace within a jailed (or b
On 14/07/2017 5:56 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 01:53:40PM +1000, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
>> Can someone advise how I can enable extended attributes in a "system"
>> namespace within a jailed (or bhyve) environment? There was no guidance
>> in "man jail" nor "man jail.c
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 01:53:40PM +1000, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> Can someone advise how I can enable extended attributes in a "system"
> namespace within a jailed (or bhyve) environment? There was no guidance
> in "man jail" nor "man jail.conf".
Mentioning jails and bhyve in a single sentence c
Can someone advise how I can enable extended attributes in a "system"
namespace within a jailed (or bhyve) environment? There was no guidance
in "man jail" nor "man jail.conf".
Simple test
>From the host or base system:
# touch /a ; setextattr user t1 first /a ; getextattr user t1 /a
/a firs
