Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-12 Thread Chris
On 12/05/06, Matthias Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jonathan Noack wrote: The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't some put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues thing. It was a long release cycle and

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-12 Thread Scott Long
Chris wrote: On 12/05/06, Matthias Andree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jonathan Noack wrote: The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't some put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues thing. It was a long

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-12 Thread Mike Jakubik
Scott Long wrote: Sorry, things got lost in the shuffle to get this released. For your specific snapshot deadlocks, please test the changes that have gone into 7-CURRENT and report back if they fix your problem. Only with active testing will we know if they are good to be backported in time

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-12 Thread David Nugent
J. T. farmer wrote: Mike Jakubik wrote: Jonathan Noack wrote: The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't some put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est la vie. It's always a

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-12 Thread Matthias Andree
Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jonathan Noack wrote: The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't some put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est la vie. It's always a

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-11 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
On 2006.05.09 01:00:14 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: Julian Elischer wrote: [...] the above points to a filel that says 6.0 errata Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems? Don't tell me these will be shoved under the rug. Send patches. -- Simon L. Nielsen

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-11 Thread Mike Jakubik
Simon L. Nielsen wrote: On 2006.05.09 01:00:14 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: Julian Elischer wrote: [...] the above points to a filel that says 6.0 errata Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems? Don't tell me these will be shoved under the rug.

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-11 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
On 2006.05.11 20:53:42 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: Simon L. Nielsen wrote: On 2006.05.09 01:00:14 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: Julian Elischer wrote: [...] the above points to a filel that says 6.0 errata Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems?

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-11 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Mike Jakubik wrote: Patches? For what? It's too late now, 6.1 has been released. I sent reminders to the RE team and i made it quite clear on the lists that the quota issue should be described in the relnotes/errata before the release. If the RE team chooses to ignore major bugs and pretend

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-11 Thread Jonathan Noack
On 05/11/06 20:53, Mike Jakubik wrote: Simon L. Nielsen wrote: On 2006.05.09 01:00:14 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: Julian Elischer wrote: [...] the above points to a filel that says 6.0 errata Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems? Don't tell me these will be

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-11 Thread Mike Jakubik
Jonathan Noack wrote: The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't some put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est la vie. It's always a good idea to check the most up-to-date

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-11 Thread Scott Long
Mike Jakubik wrote: Jonathan Noack wrote: The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't some put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est la vie. It's always a good idea to check

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-11 Thread J. T. farmer
Mike Jakubik wrote: Jonathan Noack wrote: The *entire* errata page was from 6.0; it was a mistake. This wasn't some put on the rose-colored classes and gloss over major issues thing. It was a long release cycle and something was forgotten. C'est la vie. It's always a good idea to check the

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-09 Thread Mike Jakubik
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: On Tue, 09 May 2006 01:00:14 -0400 Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems? Don't tell me these will be shoved under the rug. Oh, please. Allow the team a few minutes (at least!) to get the right

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-09 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 11:19 PM 08/05/2006, Scott Long wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE. This release is the next step in the development of the 6.X branch, delivering several performance improvements,

FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-08 Thread Scott Long
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE. This release is the next step in the development of the 6.X branch, delivering several performance improvements, many bugfixes, and a few new features. These

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-08 Thread Julian Elischer
Scott Long wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE. This release is the next step in the development of the 6.X

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-08 Thread Mike Jakubik
Julian Elischer wrote: Scott Long wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It is my great pleasure and privilege to announce the availability of FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE. This release is the next step in the

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Released

2006-05-08 Thread Torfinn Ingolfsen
On Tue, 09 May 2006 01:00:14 -0400 Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Indeed. Where is the mention of current quota/bge/em/ufs problems? Don't tell me these will be shoved under the rug. Oh, please. Allow the team a few minutes (at least!) to get the right errata in place before