On 16/11/2007, S.N.Grigoriev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:31:19 + (GMT)
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I feel that the 7.0 kernel will prove to be one of our most stable,
not to mention most performant, .0 releases to date.
Unfortunately, that's not true. For
Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:31:19 + (GMT)
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I feel that the 7.0 kernel will prove to be one of our most stable,
not to mention most performant, .0 releases to date.
Unfortunately, that's not true. For example, parallel printing
crashes my amd64 system since
Looking at the Overview of FreeBSD-7.0, I would use it as my
production, as long as my fail over servers are standby (e.g. postgres
with PITR, MySQL-5.0 with replication).
But if you are using 1 server for production use FreeBSD-6.3-R.
My 2 cents for FreeBSD-7.0-R.
br,
On Nov 14, 2007 7:23 PM,
Jimmy Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But if you are using 1 server for production use FreeBSD-6.3-R.
My 2 cents for FreeBSD-7.0-R.
For my personal servers I'll jump to 7.0-R, but for some customers,
will wait for 7.1-R.
TNX
--
One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Ivan Voras wrote:
Marko Lerota wrote:
I see that 6.3 and 7.0 is comming. Now I'm using 6.2-RELEASE for my
servers. To what should I upgrade? Which of them will be stable or
production release?
For low-loaded machines, 7.0 is stable enough even with all the new goodies
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
7.0 is a .0 release, but I think it's also a really strong .0 release.
While I might hesitate to recommend ZFS in less experimental settings, I
feel that the 7.0 kernel will prove to be one of our most stable, not to
mention most performant, .0
I see that 6.3 and 7.0 is comming. Now I'm using 6.2-RELEASE for
my servers. To what should I upgrade? Which of them will be stable
or production release?
--
One cannot sell the earth upon which the people walk
Tacunka Witco
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:23:46PM +0100, Marko Lerota wrote:
I see that 6.3 and 7.0 is comming. Now I'm using 6.2-RELEASE for
my servers. To what should I upgrade? Which of them will be stable
or production release?
I would not use dot-zero release for production without excessive
local
I see that 6.3 and 7.0 is comming. Now I'm using 6.2-RELEASE for
my servers. To what should I upgrade? Which of them will be stable
or production release?
I'm deploying FreeBSD 7 on my webservers, because they are
loadbalanced. But I will not deploy ver. 7 on my db-server until I get
to ver.
Marko Lerota wrote:
I see that 6.3 and 7.0 is comming. Now I'm using 6.2-RELEASE for
my servers. To what should I upgrade? Which of them will be stable
or production release?
Both of them will be production stable at release, i'd say that unless
you have reason, such as non-supported
Marko Lerota wrote:
I see that 6.3 and 7.0 is comming. Now I'm using 6.2-RELEASE for
my servers. To what should I upgrade? Which of them will be stable
or production release?
For low-loaded machines, 7.0 is stable enough even with all the new
goodies like ZFS, tmpfs, ULE - I have such a
Dylan Smith wrote:
Marko Lerota wrote:
I see that 6.3 and 7.0 is comming. Now I'm using 6.2-RELEASE for my
servers. To what should I upgrade? Which of them will be stable or
production release?
Both of them will be production stable at release, i'd say that unless
you have reason, such
Quoting Dylan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Marko Lerota wrote:
I see that 6.3 and 7.0 is comming. Now I'm using 6.2-RELEASE for my
servers. To what should I upgrade? Which of them will be stable or
production release?
Both of them will be production stable at release, i'd say that
unless
13 matches
Mail list logo
