Is ORAC some kind of patchset? Unless you see flow of tinderbox errors,
-STABLE is buildable almost always.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-9-1-PRERELEASE-tp5772515p5772627.html
Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Jack Raats wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In this mailinglist I'm reading a lot about problems (re)compiling the
> system. At this moment I'm running:
> "FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE (ORAC) #0 r244047: Sun Dec 9 15:33:19 CET 2012"
> without
t even if a small number of those of us who rebuild
the system without problems were to post each time we did so, there
would be a fair number of complaints from all of the noise. :-}
> At this moment I'm running:
> "FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE (ORAC) #0 r244047: Sun Dec 9 15:33:19 CET
Hi,
In this mailinglist I'm reading a lot about problems (re)compiling the system.
At this moment I'm running:
"FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE (ORAC) #0 r244047: Sun Dec 9 15:33:19 CET 2012"
without problems.
Is it save to recompile the system with all patches
