--
From: "Michael J. Ruhl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 11:09 AM
Subject: Re: Gnome compliance?
> I have had netscape processes take up 80% of my CPU, even after it
> appeared that the browser was gone.
>
> After netscape
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Dolgan wrote:
: I installed it from the ports.
:
: However, that was an unupdated ports. But it was from the ports that I got
: when I installed 4.0-STABLE. So how old could it be?
If you upgraded to 4.0-STABLE through a ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Dolgan wrote:
...
: I installed clean from a 6-27-2000 snapshot. That was yesterday. Wouldn't
: that make the ports updated, or not..?
Hmm, it should yes.
: Why would it be a ports thing, though? It's Gnome 1.2.1... latest. Is t
Unfortunately, I did that.
It seemed to have no effect. :(
KDE is fine, but I *hate hate* KDE.
- Original Message -
From: "Sean O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dolgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: G
e the old Gnome if so.
I installed both from ports, btw.
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Heckaman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dolgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 6:57 PM
Subject: Re: Gnome compliance and speed?
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNE
I don't know if this is the right place for this, and I'm still rather
inexperienced, but:
First, here's my setup:
FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE (6/27/00)
AMD K6-2 400, 128MB of ram (just providing this for proof that it's not my
hardware)
Gnome 1.2.1
Sawfish 0.28.1
XFree86 3.3.6 - also tried with X 4.0
