hi,
another suggestion would be using mirrored zfsOnRoot on each host (out of
the 2 local disks) and then use zrep to sync the pools.
use with combination of carp to active/standby cluster.
Sami
בתאריך 3 ביוני 2016 11:11 PM, "Peter Jeremy" כתב:
> On 2016-Jun-03 22:12:55 +0700, Eugene Grosbein
On 2016-Jun-03 22:12:55 +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>> all your media content is valid. I've also had bad experiences with
>> gmirror volumes silently getting out of sync on a crash.
>
>
>gmirror or (gmirror+gjournal) ones?
Plain gmirror.
--
Peter Jeremy
signature.asc
Description: PGP sign
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Eugene M. Zheganin
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On 02.06.16 19:50, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > I am suggesting next setup:
> >
> > node0:
> > own pool zroot0: mirror-0: local_disk0
> >remote-iscsi_disk1/1
> > local_disk1: exported by i
03.06.2016 2:48, Peter Jeremy пишет:
On 2016-Jun-02 12:12:35 +0500, "Eugene M. Zheganin" wrote:
differs a lot ? And why should I prefere this overcomplicated scheme
over the geom_mirror, which seems rather simple when comparing. Seems
like I can point HAST to /dev/mirror/whatever device, right
> You message lead me to a though that I could use iSCSI to replicate the
> zfs pool from node1 to both iSCSI-provided disk on a node2 in a 4-way
> mirror, right ? Are there any obvious obstacles to this, that I don't
> see, considering the bandwith will be enough ?
I have spent a long time doing
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:05:07PM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02.06.16 19:50, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >
> > I am suggesting next setup:
> >
> > node0:
> > own pool zroot0: mirror-0: local_disk0
> > remote-iscsi_disk1/1
> > local_disk1: e
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 01:40:54PM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On 02.06.16 19:50, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > I am suggesting next setup:
> >
> > node0:
> > own pool zroot0: mirror-0: local_disk0
> > remote-iscsi_disk1/1
> > local_disk1: expor
Hi,
On 02.06.16 19:50, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>
> I am suggesting next setup:
>
> node0:
> own pool zroot0: mirror-0: local_disk0
>remote-iscsi_disk1/1
> local_disk1: exported by iscsi as remote-iscsi_disk0/1 to node1
>
> node1:
> own pool zroot1: mirro
Hi.
On 02.06.16 19:50, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> I am suggesting next setup:
>
> node0:
> own pool zroot0: mirror-0: local_disk0
>remote-iscsi_disk1/1
> local_disk1: exported by iscsi as remote-iscsi_disk0/1 to node1
>
> node1:
> own pool zroot1: mirror-
On 2016-Jun-02 12:12:35 +0500, "Eugene M. Zheganin" wrote:
>differs a lot ? And why should I prefere this overcomplicated scheme
>over the geom_mirror, which seems rather simple when comparing. Seems
>like I can point HAST to /dev/mirror/whatever device, right ?
Because using RAID of any sort und
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 12:12:35PM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On 01.06.16 18:23, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >
> > Only FS support changed data bypass FS layer is Files-11 ODS-2 level,
> > may be hardware support required.
> >
> > Can you use ZFS mirror with one vdev local and oth
Hi.
On 01.06.16 18:23, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>
> Only FS support changed data bypass FS layer is Files-11 ODS-2 level,
> may be hardware support required.
>
> Can you use ZFS mirror with one vdev local and other vdev by iSCSI?
> Every node using separate ZFS pool in this case.
If you mean that
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:18:32PM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I wat to start using HAST, I have two nodes and a pair of disk on each
> node. So I want to use HASt in an environment where each HAST resource
> would be mirrored. What is the preferred approach if I want to use ZFS
Hi.
On 01.06.16 02:49, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Eugene M. Zheganin
> mailto:e...@norma.perm.ru>>wrote:
>
> I wat to start using HAST, I have two nodes and a pair of disk on
> each node. So I want to use HASt in an environment where each HAST
> resource wo
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Eugene M. Zheganin
wrote:
> I wat to start using HAST, I have two nodes and a pair of disk on each
> node. So I want to use HASt in an environment where each HAST resource
> would be mirrored. What is the preferred approach if I want to use ZFS on
> an end-device
Hi.
I wat to start using HAST, I have two nodes and a pair of disk on each
node. So I want to use HASt in an environment where each HAST resource
would be mirrored. What is the preferred approach if I want to use ZFS
on an end-device to avoid exsessive fscking, and, in the same time, I
want t
16 matches
Mail list logo