Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-12 Thread H
David Thiel wrote: On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:53:59AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: PR ? The original thread was here: http://marc.info/?t=13250246001r=1w=2 Ignore the part where it takes me a while to figure out fsck isn't softupdate-aware. There was further followup off-list with the

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-09 Thread Adrian Chadd
PR ? Adrian On 8 March 2012 11:07, David Thiel l...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 05:12:16PM -0500, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: I've been running a couple of system with 9.0-RELEASE since it is out. All the system were installed through the standard installation procedure. After

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-09 Thread David Thiel
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:53:59AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: PR ? The original thread was here: http://marc.info/?t=13250246001r=1w=2 Ignore the part where it takes me a while to figure out fsck isn't softupdate-aware. There was further followup off-list with the associated SUJ

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-09 Thread Adrian Chadd
You didn't answer my question - is there a PR opened for this? Adrian On 9 March 2012 12:02, David Thiel l...@freebsd.org wrote: On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 01:53:59AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: PR ? The original thread was here: http://marc.info/?t=13250246001r=1w=2 Ignore the part

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-08 Thread David Thiel
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 05:12:16PM -0500, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: I've been running a couple of system with 9.0-RELEASE since it is out. All the system were installed through the standard installation procedure. After unclean reboot, either crash or power-failure, I get a huge amount of really

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-06 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Xin Li wrote: On 03/05/12 14:12, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: Hi, I've been running a couple of system with 9.0-RELEASE since it is out. All the system were installed through the standard installation procedure. After unclean reboot, either crash or power-failure, I get a huge amount of

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-06 Thread Thierry Thomas
Le mar 6 mar 12 à 10:41:16 +0100, Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com écrivait : A German magazine (CT) reported on placebo cache chips some years back, chips with pins but no silicon inside. This one is original, at least:

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-06 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Thierry Thomas wrote: Le mar 6 mar 12 à 10:41:16 +0100, Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com écrivait : A German magazine (CT) reported on placebo cache chips some years back, chips with pins but no silicon inside. This one is original, at least:

Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-05 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, I've been running a couple of system with 9.0-RELEASE since it is out. All the system were installed through the standard installation procedure. After unclean reboot, either crash or power-failure, I get a huge amount of really bad filesystem corruption (read: silent, fs-wide, corruptions).

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-05 Thread Xin Li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/05/12 14:12, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: Hi, I've been running a couple of system with 9.0-RELEASE since it is out. All the system were installed through the standard installation procedure. After unclean reboot, either crash or

Re: Heavy fs corruption with 9.0-RELEASE

2012-03-05 Thread Mark Saad
On Mar 5, 2012, at 5:21 PM, Xin Li delp...@delphij.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/05/12 14:12, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: Hi, I've been running a couple of system with 9.0-RELEASE since it is out. All the system were installed through the standard