At Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:39:51 +0100,
Tom Evans wrote:
>
> [1 ]
>
> On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 15:46 +0100, Ruben van Staveren wrote:
> > On 5 Mar 2008, at 15:32, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
> > >> - IPv6 provides almost no technological upgrades beyond additional
> > >> address
> > >> space. DHCP addre
On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 15:46 +0100, Ruben van Staveren wrote:
> On 5 Mar 2008, at 15:32, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> >> - IPv6 provides almost no technological upgrades beyond additional
> >> address
> >> space. DHCP addressed the auto configuration feature, VPNs addressed
> >> IPsec.
> >
> > Th
check with Michael and see what h is status
is on it..
Thanks
R
Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:50:33 -0800; Xin LI wrote about 'Re: INET6
required for SCTP in 7.0?':
I'm not interested in enabling support for IPv6 for now.
> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 13:42:25 -0800
> From: "Peter Wemm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > There is a reasonable cha
> On 2008-03-05 22:42, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > Oh, one more thing. If you are IPv6-enabled, you get to bypass the 10
> > minute greylisting delay on mx1.freebsd.org. Your email goes through
> > instantly instead of potentially being delayed by 10-30 minutes.
>
> Until the spammers start using IPv
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Dimitry Andric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-03-05 22:42, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > Oh, one more thing. If you are IPv6-enabled, you get to bypass the 10
> > minute greylisting delay on mx1.freebsd.org. Your email goes through
> > instantly instead of potenti
On 2008-03-05 22:42, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Oh, one more thing. If you are IPv6-enabled, you get to bypass the 10
> minute greylisting delay on mx1.freebsd.org. Your email goes through
> instantly instead of potentially being delayed by 10-30 minutes.
Until the spammers start using IPv6... Then we'
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There is a reasonable chance that this mail will leave here
> > over IPv6 for some of the recipients. It will almost
> > ce
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a reasonable chance that this mail will leave here
> over IPv6 for some of the recipients. It will almost
> certainly travel over IPv6 for at least one hop.
>
> Mark
It did:
drugs.dv
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Service providers get paid to push IP packets. They shouldn't
> care which protocol version is in the header. What they
> should be worried about is ensuring that they are here in
> 4 years time.
Sure they should. The ASICs in th
Hi Andy Dills!
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 08:40:20 -0500 (EST); Andy Dills wrote about 'Re: INET6
required for SCTP in 7.0?':
>> O.K., have snipped all the above IPv4 stuff, which actually seems quite
>> reaosnable (though appears to foorget about STF), but this line...
>&g
On 5 Mar 2008, at 15:32, Mark Andrews wrote:
- IPv6 provides almost no technological upgrades beyond additional
address
space. DHCP addressed the auto configuration feature, VPNs addressed
IPsec.
That extra address space really is a big advantage. It
really is so much bette
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > It would be better to remove the option all together. IPv6
> > is no longer a protocol under development. There is no
> > need to make it optional any more. Having it there really
> > sends the wrong signal.
>
> With all due resp
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Pete French wrote:
> O.K., have snipped all the above IPv4 stuff, which actually seems quite
> reaosnable (though appears to foorget about STF), but this line...
>
> > In the meantime, I'd like to only enable IPv6 on IPv6 enabled networks.
>
> ...I fail to see how not wanting
O.K., have snipped all the above IPv4 stuff, which actually seems quite
reaosnable (though appears to foorget about STF), but this line...
> In the meantime, I'd like to only enable IPv6 on IPv6 enabled networks.
...I fail to see how not wanting to enable it leads to you wanting
to remove it from
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Mark Andrews wrote:
> It would be better to remove the option all together. IPv6
> is no longer a protocol under development. There is no
> need to make it optional any more. Having it there really
> sends the wrong signal.
With all due respect, let'
Hi Mark Andrews!
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 00:07:56 +1100; Mark Andrews wrote about 'Re: INET6
required for SCTP in 7.0?':
>>>> I'm not interested in enabling support for IPv6 for now.
>>>>
>>>> When I remove INET6 from the kernel configuration,
On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:50:33 -0800; Xin LI wrote about 'Re: INET6 required
for SCTP in 7.0?':
I'm not interested in enabling support for IPv6 for now.
When I remove INET6 from the kernel configuration, I cannot compile the
> Hi Xin LI!
>
> On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:50:33 -0800; Xin LI wrote about 'Re: INET6 required fo
> r SCTP in 7.0?':
>
> >> I'm not interested in enabling support for IPv6 for now.
> >>
> >> When I remove INET6 from the kernel configuration, I cannot compile the
> >> kernel without disabling SC
Hi Xin LI!
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:50:33 -0800; Xin LI wrote about 'Re: INET6 required for
SCTP in 7.0?':
>> I'm not interested in enabling support for IPv6 for now.
>>
>> When I remove INET6 from the kernel configuration, I cannot compile the
>> kernel
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 07:29:55PM -0500, Andy Dills wrote:
> Is this intended and/or a known issue?
Known and well-documented. If you need/want SCTP, you need to keep the
INET6 option. Otherwise, remove INET6 and remove SCTP as well.
--
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc
Andy Dills wrote:
Hi there,
I'm not interested in enabling support for IPv6 for now.
When I remove INET6 from the kernel configuration, I cannot compile the
kernel without disabling SCTP. With fresh 7.0-STABLE source, here's the
error output (INET6 disabled, but SCTP enabled):
Yes, INET6 i
Hi there,
I'm not interested in enabling support for IPv6 for now.
When I remove INET6 from the kernel configuration, I cannot compile the
kernel without disabling SCTP. With fresh 7.0-STABLE source, here's the
error output (INET6 disabled, but SCTP enabled):
uipc_syscalls.o(.text+0x3c1): In
23 matches
Mail list logo
