On Mon, 2006-Apr-10 18:45:53 -0700, Pete Slagle wrote:
When you have very limited physical RAM you need a lot of swap space.
When you have more than enough RAM you don't need any swap space at all.
For a given set of applications, as RAM increases you need less swap
space, not more. And vice
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 19:28:19 +1000
Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2006-Apr-10 18:45:53 -0700, Pete Slagle wrote:
When you have very limited physical RAM you need a lot of swap space.
When you have more than enough RAM you don't need any swap space at all.
For a given set of
2006/4/10, Michael Schuh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello @all,
last weekend i have setted up an new Machine with
6.1-Beta4. By Installation i have made an Swappartition
with the size of 4GB after install in runtime in top
it sseems to me that the maximum swap-size is
limitied to 2GB or better to
Michael Schuh wrote this message on Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 12:56 +0200:
My Problem was that i can't show my configured swapsize
right...
Partitionsize for swap was 4GB
Showing Value was 2GB,
could you post swapinfo -k and disklabel of the appropriate disks?
--
John-Mark Gurney
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 10:48:08AM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 01:47, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:13:07PM +0200, Michael Schuh wrote:
Hello @all,
last weekend i have setted up an new Machine with
6.1-Beta4. By Installation i have made
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 12:56:30PM +0200, Michael Schuh wrote:
2006/4/10, Michael Schuh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello @all,
last weekend i have setted up an new Machine with
6.1-Beta4. By Installation i have made an Swappartition
with the size of 4GB after install in runtime in top
it
From 'man tuning' (I think I wrote this, a long time ago):
You should typically size your swap space to approximately 2x main mem-
ory. If you do not have a lot of RAM, though, you will generally want a
lot more swap. It is not recommended that you configure any less than
Hello @all,
last weekend i have setted up an new Machine with
6.1-Beta4. By Installation i have made an Swappartition
with the size of 4GB after install in runtime in top
it sseems to me that the maximum swap-size is
limitied to 2GB or better to INT_MAX ?
At another MAchine with FreeBSD4.11 i
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:13:07PM +0200, Michael Schuh wrote:
Hello @all,
last weekend i have setted up an new Machine with
6.1-Beta4. By Installation i have made an Swappartition
with the size of 4GB after install in runtime in top
it sseems to me that the maximum swap-size is
limitied
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 01:47, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:13:07PM +0200, Michael Schuh wrote:
Hello @all,
last weekend i have setted up an new Machine with
6.1-Beta4. By Installation i have made an Swappartition
with the size of 4GB after install in runtime in top
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
The old swap size = 2x RAM rule is no longer applicable unless you have a
very special application.
This rule always seemed counterintuitive to me anyway.
When you have very limited physical RAM you need a lot of swap space.
When you have more than enough RAM you
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
The old swap size = 2x RAM rule is no longer applicable unless you have a
very special application.
This rule always seemed counterintuitive to me anyway.
When you have very limited physical RAM you need a lot of swap space.
When you have more than enough
Pete Slagle wrote:
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
The old swap size = 2x RAM rule is no longer applicable unless you
have a very special application.
This rule always seemed counterintuitive to me anyway.
When you have very limited physical RAM you need a lot of swap space.
When you have more
On Apr 10, 2006, at 21:45, Pete Slagle wrote:
When you have more than enough RAM you don't need any swap space at
all.
You need enough swap space to do a dump in case a panic occurs.
While panics are (hopefully) rare, if it does happen, you usually
want things set up so that you can
14 matches
Mail list logo
