Re: Newer clang than comes with install?

2016-03-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 09:53:08AM -0500, Kevin P. Neal wrote: > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:22:26PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:45:05AM -0500, kpn...@pobox.com wrote: > > > I notice on 10.2 we're using "FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1". But there are > > > bugs in this

Re: Newer clang than comes with install?

2016-03-05 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 04 Mar 2016, at 15:53, Kevin P. Neal wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:22:26PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:45:05AM -0500, kpn...@pobox.com wrote: >>> I notice on 10.2 we're using "FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1". But there are >>> bugs in

Re: Newer clang than comes with install?

2016-03-05 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 03 Mar 2016, at 14:45, kpn...@pobox.com wrote: > > I notice on 10.2 we're using "FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1". But there are > bugs in this version of clang that I'm having trouble with. Which specific bugs are those? > Is compiling a newer (say, 3.7.1) version of clang to target FreeBSD >

Re: Newer clang than comes with install?

2016-03-04 Thread Shane Ambler
On 05/03/2016 01:23, Kevin P. Neal wrote: On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:22:26PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:45:05AM -0500, kpn...@pobox.com wrote: I notice on 10.2 we're using "FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1". But there are bugs in this version of clang that I'm having

Re: Newer clang than comes with install?

2016-03-04 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:45:05AM -0500, kpn...@pobox.com wrote: > I notice on 10.2 we're using "FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1". But there are > bugs in this version of clang that I'm having trouble with. > > Is compiling a newer (say, 3.7.1) version of clang to target FreeBSD > supported? I have