Re: Ok, are all the panics fixed now?

2003-08-30 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 11:34:19PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Tor Egge wrote: I'm enclosed a patch that introduces PADDR2/PMAP2 which is to be used by pmap_pte() (should not be called from interrupts on noncurrent pmaps) while pmap_pte_quick() (should not be

Re: Ok, are all the panics fixed now?

2003-08-28 Thread David G. Lawrence
At 11:42 PM 27/08/2003 +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: It's simple: we need to backout all these untested MFCs. I dont think people throw in untested MFCs into STABLE. They do their best effort and with that, there will still be some bugs. Its that simple. Well, we all have different

Re: Ok, are all the panics fixed now?

2003-08-28 Thread John Hay
So, I think we'll just include a warning with 4.9: WARNING! Do not attempt to stress a FreeBSD 4.9 machine if you: or Upgrade your FreeBSD to RedHat. s/RedHat/FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE/ It's simple: we need to backout all these untested MFCs. Or fix the bugs. I don't know

Re: Ok, are all the panics fixed now?

2003-08-27 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Mike Silbersack wrote: Ah, that's a good idea! I'll try setting hw.physmem down to 12M or so and see if that causes the panics to occur over here. Mike Silby Silbersack Ok, I booted with hw.physmem=16M, and a buildworld paniced with free/cache page dirty. (I was

Re: Ok, are all the panics fixed now?

2003-08-27 Thread Mike Harding
RAM is cheap, so I don't need swapping. Naps are -not- negotiable. :) - Mike H. X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:34:15 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL

Re: Ok, are all the panics fixed now?

2003-08-27 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 01:34 PM 27/08/2003 -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: Ok, I booted with hw.physmem=16M, and a buildworld paniced with free/cache page dirty. (I was taking a nap at the time the buildworld crashed, we'll talk about that soon.) (Are you guys running with INVARIANTS?) Nope, I am not. Should I be ?

Re: Ok, are all the panics fixed now?

2003-08-27 Thread Maxim Konovalov
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, 13:34-0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Mike Silbersack wrote: Ah, that's a good idea! I'll try setting hw.physmem down to 12M or so and see if that causes the panics to occur over here. Mike Silby Silbersack Ok, I booted with hw.physmem=16M,

Re: Ok, are all the panics fixed now?

2003-08-27 Thread Colin Percival
At 23:42 27/08/2003 +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, 13:34-0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: So, I think we'll just include a warning with 4.9: WARNING! Do not attempt to stress a FreeBSD 4.9 machine if you: or Upgrade your FreeBSD to RedHat. s/RedHat/FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE/ It's

Re: Ok, are all the panics fixed now?

2003-08-27 Thread Maxim Konovalov
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, 12:56-0700, Colin Percival wrote: At 23:42 27/08/2003 +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, 13:34-0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: So, I think we'll just include a warning with 4.9: WARNING! Do not attempt to stress a FreeBSD 4.9 machine if you:

Re: Ok, are all the panics fixed now?

2003-08-27 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 11:42 PM 27/08/2003 +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: It's simple: we need to backout all these untested MFCs. I dont think people throw in untested MFCs into STABLE. They do their best effort and with that, there will still be some bugs. Its that simple. ---Mike