Hello,
Until today, when I was asked what WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes should do.. i
was obviously wrong:
I think whole openssl should be replaced, but :
[mym:~] # which openssl
/usr/bin/openssl
[mym:~] # openssl version
OpenSSL 0.9.8x 10 May 2012
there IS a 1.0.1 version but it is not found whit
Am 07/30/12 20:04, schrieb Beat Siegenthaler:
Hello,
Until today, when I was asked what WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes should do.. i
was obviously wrong:
I think whole openssl should be replaced, but :
[mym:~] # which openssl
/usr/bin/openssl
[mym:~] # openssl version
OpenSSL 0.9.8x 10 May 2012
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 20:36 +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
Am 07/30/12 20:04, schrieb Beat Siegenthaler:
Hello,
Until today, when I was asked what WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes should do.. i
was obviously wrong:
I think whole openssl should be replaced, but :
[mym:~] # which openssl
On 30.07.12 20:36, O. Hartmann wrote
I guess you need to ensure that the path /usr/local/bin is searched BEFORE
/usr/bin. If you're using
sh(1) as the standard shell of yours, you should ensure this by using
something like the following in .profile (or .cshrc, if csh(1)):
Never tweaked that:
Am 07/30/12 20:46, schrieb Ian Lepore:
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 20:36 +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
Am 07/30/12 20:04, schrieb Beat Siegenthaler:
Hello,
Until today, when I was asked what WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes should do.. i
was obviously wrong:
I think whole openssl should be replaced, but :
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:01:23 +0200
Beat Siegenthaler beat.siegentha...@beatsnet.com wrote:
It seems to be important to know, what build from port means. There is
still some tweaking necessary.
thanks
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing
On 30/07/2012 21:38, Chuck Burns wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:01:23 +0200
Beat Siegenthaler beat.siegentha...@beatsnet.com wrote:
It seems to be important to know, what build from port means. There is
still some tweaking necessary.
Is it possible that openssl in base is just left over from
