Hello,
We upgraded out FreeBSD6 amd64 machine to 6-STABLE on Monday, 2006-03-06.
From there, we applied the quota-deadlock patch (which also seems to be in
the 1.80 version of ufs_quota.c). Since doing so, we have had no deadlocks
on the machine. Before the patch, we were experiencing
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 03:32:33PM -0500, Matt Houston wrote:
Hello,
We upgraded out FreeBSD6 amd64 machine to 6-STABLE on Monday, 2006-03-06.
From there, we applied the quota-deadlock patch (which also seems to be in
the 1.80 version of ufs_quota.c). Since doing so, we have had
Hello.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:51:39AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 08:40:37AM +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Anyway, I'll discuss with my colleagues and we'll see if we want to take
the risk.
Thanks, it would be a big help if you're willing to try.
We're in
On 28. feb. 2006, at 06.23, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 02:56:01PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Jeff has been too busy to send this patch himself, but it fixed the
quota deadlock that I was able to provoke on my machine. Does it
also
solve the issue for others?
I've seen
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 09:51, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 08:40:37AM +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Anyway, I'll discuss with my colleagues and we'll see if we want to take
the risk.
Thanks, it would be a big help if you're willing to try.
Kris
I'm jumping here
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:58:02AM +0200, Niki Denev wrote:
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 09:51, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 08:40:37AM +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Anyway, I'll discuss with my colleagues and we'll see if we want to take
the risk.
Thanks, it would
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:00:40AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:58:02AM +0200, Niki Denev wrote:
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 09:51, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 08:40:37AM +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Anyway, I'll discuss with my colleagues
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 12:03, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[...]
Thanks, I forgot about this. You'll need these patches too:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c.diff?r1
=1.77r2=1.78
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c.diff?r1
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 12:15, Niki Denev wrote:
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 12:03, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[...]
Thanks, I forgot about this. You'll need these patches too:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c.diff?
r1 =1.77r2=1.78
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 01:21:59PM +0200, Niki Denev wrote:
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 12:15, Niki Denev wrote:
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 12:03, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[...]
Thanks, I forgot about this. You'll need these patches too:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 02:56:01PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Jeff has been too busy to send this patch himself, but it fixed the
quota deadlock that I was able to provoke on my machine. Does it also
solve the issue for others?
I've seen 0 feedback about this so far. Since a number of
Hi Kris.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 12:23:28AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 02:56:01PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Jeff has been too busy to send this patch himself, but it fixed the
quota deadlock that I was able to provoke on my machine. Does it also
solve the issue
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 08:40:37AM +0100, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Anyway, I'll discuss with my colleagues and we'll see if we want to take
the risk.
Thanks, it would be a big help if you're willing to try.
Kris
pgpBG7ao7EXg0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Jeff has been too busy to send this patch himself, but it fixed the
quota deadlock that I was able to provoke on my machine. Does it also
solve the issue for others?
Kris
- Forwarded message from Jeff Roberson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL
14 matches
Mail list logo
