Steve Hodgson wrote:
Could you use objcopy --redefine-sym to rename the symbol in the
flash library? I've not tried it of course.
I just ran into this issue again. I tried this suggestion. It doesn't
change the dynamic reference.
I see the linuxpluginwrapper port has now been updated to
Stefan Lambrev wrote:
Hello,
While talking about custom patches, what's the best way to apply patches
after every cvsup.
The two most common ways to do this are to cvsup the CVS repo and then
check out your sources; and to write a script that calls cvsup, and
then immediately applies your
Hello,
While talking about custom patches, what's the best way to apply patches
after every cvsup.
In my case I'm using custom patches for bktr and network driver nfe from
HEAD.
As freebsd 6.2 is coming soon and there is work in progress on nfsmb
and I would like to test those new
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
The patch is evil, of that there is no doubt. However a wide cross
section of the user base will want to run a recent version of Flash
whilst 9 is not available.
Can't we work around the dlsym issue in the port with some linker magic?
Could you use objcopy
On Friday 27 October 2006 17:09, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
As freebsd 6.2 is coming soon and there is work in progress on nfsmb
and I would like to test those new features/drivers I cvsup very often
and sometimes I forget to apply my custom patches :)
The good thing is that all my patches are in
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 03:04:09PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Oct 24), Doug Barton said:
Duane Whitty wrote:
Patching it myself after every cvs update is not such a big deal; It
is forgetting to patch it after every update which is a big deal.
Write a little script
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:08:32PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 03:04:09PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Oct 24), Doug Barton said:
Duane Whitty wrote:
Patching it myself after every cvs update is not such a big deal; It
is forgetting to patch it
The patch is evil, of that there is no doubt. However a wide cross
section of the user base will want to run a recent version of Flash
whilst 9 is not available.
Can't we work around the dlsym issue in the port with some linker magic?
Regards,
BMS
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 02:04:31AM -0300, Duane Whitty wrote:
--- rtld.c.orig Sun Oct 22 20:21:10 2006
+++ rtld.c Sun Oct 22 20:22:37 2006
@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@
static void ref_dag(Obj_Entry *);
void r_debug_state(struct r_debug*, struct link_map*);
+__weak_reference(dlsym, _dlsym);
Duane Whitty wrote:
Patching it myself after every cvs update is not such a
big deal; It is forgetting to patch it after every update which is a
big deal.
Write a little script for yourself that calls cvsup then runs patch so
you won't forget. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized
In the last episode (Oct 24), Doug Barton said:
Duane Whitty wrote:
Patching it myself after every cvs update is not such a big deal; It
is forgetting to patch it after every update which is a big deal.
Write a little script for yourself that calls cvsup then runs patch
so you won't forget.
--- rtld.c.orig Sun Oct 22 20:21:10 2006
+++ rtld.c Sun Oct 22 20:22:37 2006
@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@
static void ref_dag(Obj_Entry *);
void r_debug_state(struct r_debug*, struct link_map*);
+__weak_reference(dlsym, _dlsym);
/*
* Data declarations.
It seems that so many of us have been
12 matches
Mail list logo
