On Sunday, 26. June 2005 01:18, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
If there was significant product differentiation between xfree86 and
xorg, then there would be a reason to keep both. Right now there is
not and with the difficulty in X development, there won't soon be.
There's already quite a delta on
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Warren
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 4:17 AM
To: Daniel O'Connor
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 9:11 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:35, Warren wrote
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 09:14:26AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Why are you building xfree86? FreeBSD 5.4 uses Xorg. It's
just about the same code just different licensing. I don't think the
FreeBSD core is bothering to keep the xfree86 port working on FreeBSD 5.X
just FreeBSD 4.11
I'm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Linimon
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 11:25 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Daniel O'Connor; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Warren;
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed
On Sun, 26 Jun 2005 7:45 am, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
But the plain fact of the matter is that the Open Source community
isn't going to tolerate what xfree86 tried doing, and the users of
open source, which is you and I, are not served by splitting development
between 2 forks of X Windows. The
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 02:45:45PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I'm sorry to step on the toes of the port maintainer but instead
of complaining about it you need to respond to the realitites.
In general I would rather do that than argue, yes.
make: don't know how to make /drm.h. Stop
***
-Original Message-
From: Mark Linimon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 3:51 PM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Mark Linimon; Daniel O'Connor; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Warren;
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade in Xfree86 pkg failed
On Sat, Jun 25
ln
-s
/usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/xf86drmRandom.c
xf86drmRandom.c
rm -f xf86drmSL.c
ln
-s
/usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/xf86drmSL.c
xf86drmSL.c
make: don't know how to
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:35, Warren wrote:
ln
-s
/usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-supp
ort/linux/drm/xf86drmRandom.c xf86drmRandom.c
rm -f xf86drmSL.c
ln
-s
/usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-supp
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 9:11 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:35, Warren wrote:
ln
-s
/usr/ports/graphics/xfree86-dri/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-su
pp ort/linux/drm/xf86drmRandom.c xf86drmRandom.c
rm -f xf86drmSL.c
ln
-s
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:47, Warren wrote:
Just before doing PortUpgrade before sending the 1st email
Did you read /usr/ports/UPDATING?
cant say as i did.
Well that was silly..
Not that I think there is a specific entry in this case but it is a good habit
to get in to..
Do you have the
11 matches
Mail list logo
