We've seen JVM lockups during high contention Threading operations with
the jdk15 port. The same code succeeded when running under diablo-jdk.
I have precious little information on the details of the failure we saw
so I'm hesitant to toss the jdk15 port squarely under the bus without
more
Stefan Walter wrote:
Hi,
Bill Smith, 06.03.07, 18:25h CET:
I have been having problems with this as well, I have the linprocfs
mounted, but the buil is
dying with the following error:
../../../src/share/classes/sun/net/www/protocol/http/HttpURLConnection.java:1186
: warning:
Hi,
Bill Smith, 06.03.07, 18:25h CET:
I have been having problems with this as well, I have the linprocfs
mounted, but the buil is
dying with the following error:
../../../src/share/classes/sun/net/www/protocol/http/HttpURLConnection.java:1186
: warning: non-varargs call
Stefan Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It might be easier for you to just use the java/diablo-jdk15 port, which
installs precompiled binaries.
Although I have, with the much appreciated help from people here,
successfully installed the jdk15 port in between, I thought about
diablo-jdk15, too.
Sam Baskinger wrote:
Juergen Nickelsen wrote:
On Feb 27 2007, Chris Timmons wrote:
Don't forget that the linux JDK will want you to have linprocfs
mounted. I recently had a similar build experience of jdk-1.5.0p4
which cleared up fine after I remembered about linprocfs.
linprocfs
- Juergen Nickelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
But indeed I was ignorant of the diablo port. What is the relation
between these two ports anyway? I do not really get the difference,
in spite of http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/downloads/java.shtml.
...
There are some license
On 07. Mrz 2007, at 8:12, Tom Samplonius wrote:
There are some license restrictions on distribution of jdk
binaries. In order to be distributable, jdk binaries need to pass
Sun's test suite (TCK). So the Diablo binary passes, and is
distributation. The port, is just source, and does
Juergen Nickelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:22:44AM -0500, Sam Baskinger wrote:
I'm assuming that you installed linux compatibility and then the
linux-jdk 1.4? I failed to do that and saw a very similar error a while
back. :)
That may well be the case. I
Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You could also install the native diablo-jdk15 port instead of a Linux
one.
I was installing the native port /usr/ports/java/jdk15, only it
needs the Linux JDK 1.4.2 to compile the Java sources.
But indeed I was ignorant of the diablo port. What is the
On Feb 27 2007, Chris Timmons wrote:
Don't forget that the linux JDK will want you to have linprocfs
mounted. I recently had a similar build experience of jdk-1.5.0p4
which cleared up fine after I remembered about linprocfs.
linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0
Hm. I
Juergen Nickelsen wrote:
On Feb 27 2007, Chris Timmons wrote:
Don't forget that the linux JDK will want you to have linprocfs
mounted. I recently had a similar build experience of jdk-1.5.0p4
which cleared up fine after I remembered about linprocfs.
linprocfs /compat/linux/proc
PROTECTED] lsen.de
Newsgroups: w21.lists.freebsd-stable
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] d.org
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 4:37 PM
Subject: Problems installing JDK 1.5
Hello,
on a more or less newly installed machine with 5.5-STABLE (updated
recently) I tried to install JDK 1.5
I'm assuming that you installed linux compatibility and then the
linux-jdk 1.4? I failed to do that and saw a very similar error a while
back. :)
Sam Baskinger
Lumeta - Securing the Network in the Face of Change
www.lumeta.com
Juergen Nickelsen wrote:
Hello,
on a more or less newly
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:22:44AM -0500, Sam Baskinger wrote:
I'm assuming that you installed linux compatibility and then the
linux-jdk 1.4? I failed to do that and saw a very similar error a while
back. :)
That may well be the case. I assumed the port installed it as a
dependency, but I
In the last episode (Feb 27), Juergen Nickelsen said:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:22:44AM -0500, Sam Baskinger wrote:
I'm assuming that you installed linux compatibility and then the
linux-jdk 1.4? I failed to do that and saw a very similar error a
while back. :)
That may well be the
Don't forget that the linux JDK will want you to have linprocfs mounted.
I recently had a similar build experience of jdk-1.5.0p4 which cleared up
fine after I remembered about linprocfs.
linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0
-Chris
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Juergen Nickelsen
Hello,
on a more or less newly installed machine with 5.5-STABLE (updated
recently) I tried to install JDK 1.5 via /usr/ports/. After
retrieving all necessary files, the build failed quite mysteriously,
even more so as I had succeeded with another machine fine last year.
In the build protocol
17 matches
Mail list logo