On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:24:41PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Vivek Khera wrote:
VK My list of software is purely server stuff; I
VK don't use any FreeBSD desktops.
It seems to be the key point here.
I'm thinking about giving a try for the following scheme for my
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 01:59:03PM +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:24:41PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Vivek Khera wrote:
VK My list of software is purely server stuff; I
VK don't use any FreeBSD desktops.
It seems to be the key point
Roland Smith wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 01:59:03PM +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:24:41PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Vivek Khera wrote:
VK My list of software is purely server stuff; I
VK don't use any FreeBSD desktops.
It seems to
On Sep 27, 2007, at 8:22 PM, Greg Black wrote:
Since we're close to a new release, I'm wondering what experience
people
have had recently with running in 64-bit mode. Are most of those
broken
ports now fixed? Or is there some magic that allows building of just
the broken ones in 32-bit
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Vivek Khera wrote:
VK
VK On Sep 27, 2007, at 8:22 PM, Greg Black wrote:
VK
VK Since we're close to a new release, I'm wondering what experience people
VK have had recently with running in 64-bit mode. Are most of those broken
VK ports now fixed? Or is there some magic
When I first did an AMD64 install on my then-new 64-bit hardware, I was
happy with the way FreeBSD itself behaved, but seriously hampered by the
huge number of ports that were marked broken for 64-bit architectures at
that time. Eventually, I just re-installed as i386 and went on with my
life.
[note: this question probably should have been asked and answered on
freebsd-ports@, but I'll go ahead and answer it here in any case.]
The latest chart that compares package status across build environments
is at http://portsmon.freebsd.org/chartsandgraphs/package_comparison.html.
Note: the
