Question: /usr/sbin/pkg vs /usr/local/sbin/pkg in 9.1

2012-12-27 Thread Rainer Duffner
Hi, as I see it, pkgng is actually included in 9.1 as /usr/sbin/pkg, right? But when I define WITH_PKGNG=yes in /etc/make.conf the ports-system wants to install the pkgng-package (because it looks for pkgng in /usr/local/sbin). Is there a way to say I have the pkg tool in base already? Or is

Re: Question: /usr/sbin/pkg vs /usr/local/sbin/pkg in 9.1

2012-12-27 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 27/12/2012 09:44, Rainer Duffner wrote: as I see it, pkgng is actually included in 9.1 as /usr/sbin/pkg, right? /usr/sbin/pkg and /usr/local/sbin/pkg are very different. /usr/local/sbin/pkg is a binary package management system. /usr/sbin/pkg is a shim that can bootstrap the installation of

Re: Question: /usr/sbin/pkg vs /usr/local/sbin/pkg in 9.1

2012-12-27 Thread David Demelier
On 27/12/2012 11:02, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 27/12/2012 09:44, Rainer Duffner wrote: as I see it, pkgng is actually included in 9.1 as /usr/sbin/pkg, right? /usr/sbin/pkg and /usr/local/sbin/pkg are very different. /usr/local/sbin/pkg is a binary package management system. /usr/sbin/pkg is

Re: Question: /usr/sbin/pkg vs /usr/local/sbin/pkg in 9.1

2012-12-27 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-12-27 11:35, David Demelier wrote: On 27/12/2012 11:02, Matthew Seaman wrote: ... pkgng is not in base and there are no plans to import it. If you are going to use pkgng then you need to install it, either from ports or by using the /usr/sbin/pkg shim to install from a pkgng package.

Re: Question: /usr/sbin/pkg vs /usr/local/sbin/pkg in 9.1

2012-12-27 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 27/12/2012 10:38, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-12-27 11:35, David Demelier wrote: On 27/12/2012 11:02, Matthew Seaman wrote: pkgng is not in base and there are no plans to import it. If you are going to use pkgng then you need to install it, either from ports or by using the