Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you ask me, kernel developer | server install should be on
disc1, and desktop^*$ should go on disc99.
FreeBSD
...the power to serve.
^
eh ?
???
So what do you propose to use as workstations with your
Quoting Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi !
In this context, I believe that it makes more sense to place the
server related install on the first disc. This makes it possible
to install a server with the least amount of effort.
Granted.
It /also/
makes it quite possible for a would-be desktop
--On Monday, March 03, 2008 02:20:49 -0800 Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would assert that FreeBSD is first and foremost a Server OS.
The fact that it can also provide a full blown desktop, is so much
the better.
In this context, I believe that it makes more sense to place the
server
Quoting Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--On Monday, March 03, 2008 02:20:49 -0800 Chris H.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would assert that FreeBSD is first and foremost a Server OS.
The fact that it can also provide a full blown desktop, is so much
the better.
In this context, I believe that it
Quoting Ken Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 19:18 -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Another approach might be to make one cd the desktop install cd,
including all of the apps commonly used to install the desktop (xorg, kde,
gnome, etc.)
This is already in place, as best I can.
Quoting Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you ask me, kernel developer | server install should be on
disc1, and desktop^*$ should go on disc99.
FreeBSD
...the power to serve.
^
eh ?
???
So what do you propose to use as workstations with your FreeBSD servers ?
(Not that
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 08:01:56AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what do you propose to use as workstations with your FreeBSD servers ?
(Not that I see much difference in philosophy, nowadays: servers used to be
those machines with high throughput all along the night, and now they
Quoting Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On behalf of the FreeBSD Project thanks for your interest in FreeBSD.
We hope you enjoy the new release.
I've just spent the whole morning installing it on my office desktop.
It was an awful experience: installing packages
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 19:18:52 -0600
Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does seem to me that some work in this area would pay dividends.
Suggestion for a quick fix (hack might be the right word):
1. first time one of the extra cd's is read, the user gets a choice to
copy the cd to hard
Le Thursday 28 February 2008 13:18:30 Kris Kennaway, vous avez écrit :
freebsd update requires a known state to upgrade from, i.e. so it can
apply the right set of diffs to bring your system from one known state
to another. This basically means previously installed from the release
media and
Chris H. wrote:
* log on as root - or su to root after logging on as regular user
* type /usr/sbin/sysinstall - this brings up the installer again
* choose post install
* choose install additional ports/packages
* choose net/cvsup-without-gui
* when finished, exit the installer
A very nice
Quoting Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BSD is /different/. Which is /not/ bad, just /different/. :)
Never said it was bad (on the *very* contrary)
Been using it for a little more than 10 years now: would I have been if I had
thought otherwise ? ;-)
* choose net/cvsup-without-gui
no longer
Matthew Seaman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On behalf of the FreeBSD Project thanks for your interest in FreeBSD.
We hope you enjoy the new release.
I've just spent the whole morning installing it on my office desktop.
It was an awful experience: installing packages from the
Quoting Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Chris H. wrote:
* log on as root - or su to root after logging on as regular user
* type /usr/sbin/sysinstall - this brings up the installer again
* choose post install
* choose install additional ports/packages
* choose net/cvsup-without-gui
* when
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BSD is /different/. Which is /not/ bad, just /different/. :)
Never said it was bad (on the *very* contrary)
Been using it for a little more than 10 years now: would I have been if I had
thought otherwise ? ;-)
* choose
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 19:18 -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Another approach might be to make one cd the desktop install cd,
including all of the apps commonly used to install the desktop (xorg, kde,
gnome, etc.)
This is already in place, as best I can. X.org is on disc1 (on purpose
since it's
But I'm not up to it right now. I'll save it for another posting.
Posting come go forgotten, so I suggest send your final script
as a send-pr to eg the doc/ tree. That (doc/ tree) ( www tree generated
from it, copied in advanced to local host) people can have available
eg on local laptop,
--On Saturday, March 01, 2008 3:32 PM +0800 Nawfal bin Mohmad Rouyan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can actually use csup instead of cvsup and it is already included in
the base.
I knew that, but old habits die hard. Plus I haven't read the csup man
page yet. :-)
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL
Quoting Ken Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi !
On behalf of the FreeBSD Project thanks for your interest in FreeBSD.
We hope you enjoy the new release.
I've just spent the whole morning installing it on my office desktop.
It was an awful experience: installing packages from the three CDs kept
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On behalf of the FreeBSD Project thanks for your interest in FreeBSD.
We hope you enjoy the new release.
I've just spent the whole morning installing it on my office desktop.
It was an awful experience: installing packages from the three CDs kept making
me switch
--On Friday, February 29, 2008 11:54 PM + Matthew Seaman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On behalf of the FreeBSD Project thanks for your interest in FreeBSD.
We hope you enjoy the new release.
I've just spent the whole morning installing it on my office desktop.
It
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 19:18 -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Friday, February 29, 2008 11:54 PM + Matthew Seaman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On behalf of the FreeBSD Project thanks for your interest in FreeBSD.
We hope you enjoy the new release.
I've just
Le Wednesday 27 February 2008 23:32:55 Ken Smith, vous avez écrit :
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html
On behalf of the FreeBSD Project thanks for your interest in FreeBSD.
We hope you enjoy the new release.
I am trying to use the freebsd-update script for the first time.
Le Thursday 28 February 2008 12:32:28 David Marec, vous avez écrit :
I am trying to use the freebsd-update script for the first time.
sh -x freebsd-update.sh -f freebsd-update.conf -r 7.0-RELEASE upgrade
--
+ fetch -q http://update1.FreeBSD.org/6.3-STABLE/i386/pub.ssl
+ true
+ [ -r pub.ssl ]
Thank you all and Congrats! :)
Regards,
-Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
Arab Portal
http://www.WeArab.Net/
- Original Message
From: Ken Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-stable freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 1:32:55 AM
Subject:
David Marec wrote:
Le Thursday 28 February 2008 12:32:28 David Marec, vous avez écrit :
I am trying to use the freebsd-update script for the first time.
sh -x freebsd-update.sh -f freebsd-update.conf -r 7.0-RELEASE upgrade
freebsd update requires a known state to upgrade from, i.e. so it
Congrats :))
I have been waiting it :
p.s. yesteday csuped sources and rebuilded world,
but my tag in supfile was RELENG_7 not 7_0
and now in dmesg i am stil getting FreeBSD 7 PRERELEASE
is this a problem, and should i csup again and rebuild world again?
Georgi Iovchev
Georgi Iovchev wrote:
Congrats :))
I have been waiting it :
p.s. yesteday csuped sources and rebuilded world,
but my tag in supfile was RELENG_7 not 7_0
and now in dmesg i am stil getting FreeBSD 7 PRERELEASE
is this a problem, and should i csup again and rebuild world
Congrats :))
I have been waiting it :
p.s. yesteday csuped sources and rebuilded world,
but my tag in supfile was RELENG_7 not 7_0
and now in dmesg i am stil getting FreeBSD 7 PRERELEASE
is this a problem, and should i csup again and rebuild world again?
Georgi Iovchev
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 02:32:11PM +0200, Georgi Iovchev wrote:
p.s. yesteday csuped sources and rebuilded world,
but my tag in supfile was RELENG_7 not 7_0
and now in dmesg i am stil getting FreeBSD 7 PRERELEASE
is this a problem, and should i csup again and rebuild world again?
Greetings,
Georgi Iovchev wrote:
Congrats :))
I have been waiting it :
p.s. yesteday csuped sources and rebuilded world,
but my tag in supfile was RELENG_7 not 7_0
RELENG_7 will show 7.0-STABLE.
If you want release use RELENG_7_0.
I guess there is not big difference between
Thank you all for answers.
I guess i'll use stable (R_7) in home and release (R_7_0 for now) on servers
Have a good rebuilding night! :
Stefan Lambrev wrote ..
Greetings,
Georgi Iovchev wrote:
Congrats :))
I have been waiting it :
p.s. yesteday csuped sources and
Terrific job!
Thanks for anyone contributed to this fine release :)
On Feb 27, 2008, at 5:32 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
Just in case some interested parties are not subscribed to the
freebsd-announce mailing list... FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE has been
formally
released. If you would like to see the
Ken Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html
On behalf of the FreeBSD Project thanks for your interest in FreeBSD.
We hope you enjoy the new release.
Thanks for all your work (done and to be done).
Dirk
Ken Smith wrote:
Just in case some interested parties are not subscribed to the
freebsd-announce mailing list... FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE has been formally
released. If you would like to see the release announcement it's here:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html
On behalf of the
35 matches
Mail list logo
