On 20 May 2009, at 1:01, Kip Macy wrote:
I would recommend that you use the ZFS_MFC branch - it is the same as
what will be in RELENG_7 tomorrow afternoon.
This is great news, and given the testing it should be no problem I
feel...
After setting vm.kmem_size to the recommended minimum I
Unfortunately not a lot but we can do the following:
- Donate some hardware (Fibre Channel HBAs) to the FreeBSD project (paid
from my pocket, not my employer's one);
- Donate some money (paid from my employer's pocket, if I can demonstrate
that this can help us to save big bucks on high-end
On Mon, 18 May 2009, Dimitry Andric wrote:
DA On 2009-05-16 02:02, Kip Macy wrote:
DA I've MFC'd ZFS v13 to RELENG_7 in a work branch. Please test if you can.
DA
DA http://svn.freebsd.org/base/user/kmacy/ZFS_MFC/
DA
DA The standard disclaimers apply. This has only been lightly tested in a
On 2009-05-19 13:33, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
Would you please also post diff to RELENG_7 there?
http://www.andric.com/freebsd/zfs13/r192269/zfs_mfc-r192269.diff.bz2
This diff should apply with no fuzz and no rejects to RELENG_7 as of
r192386 (2009-05-19 15:33:41 UTC). For earlier or later
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Dimitry Andric wrote:
DA Would you please also post diff to RELENG_7 there?
DA
DA http://www.andric.com/freebsd/zfs13/r192269/zfs_mfc-r192269.diff.bz2
DA
DA This diff should apply with no fuzz and no rejects to RELENG_7 as of
DA r192386 (2009-05-19 15:33:41 UTC). For
http://www.andric.com/freebsd/zfs13/r192269/zfs_mfc-r192269.diff.bz2
Thanks - am going to gve this a try later. Preseumably if I leave the
pool at the revision it is currently on then I can revert back easily ?
Also, is this the version which no longer requires any tuning parameters
in
On 2009-05-19 19:41, Pete French wrote:
http://www.andric.com/freebsd/zfs13/r192269/zfs_mfc-r192269.diff.bz2
Thanks - am going to gve this a try later. Preseumably if I leave the
pool at the revision it is currently on then I can revert back easily ?
I'll just repeat what Kip told us, The
Many people are happily running an old pool with the new code. I have
done that in a VM and run load over it just to be certain. The tuning
still applies to i386. On amd64 vm backpressure works, but may
actually be too aggressive - shrinking the ARC in favor of the
inactive pages queue.
Cheers,
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Dimitry Andric wrote:
DA http://www.andric.com/freebsd/zfs13/r192269/zfs_mfc-r192269.diff.bz2
DA
DA Thanks - am going to gve this a try later. Preseumably if I leave the
DA pool at the revision it is currently on then I can revert back easily ?
DA
DA I'll just repeat
Dimitry,
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Dimitry Andric wrote:
DA Would you please also post diff to RELENG_7 there?
DA
DA http://www.andric.com/freebsd/zfs13/r192269/zfs_mfc-r192269.diff.bz2
DA
DA This diff should apply with no fuzz and no rejects to RELENG_7 as of
DA r192386 (2009-05-19 15:33:41 UTC).
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
DM DA http://www.andric.com/freebsd/zfs13/r192269/zfs_mfc-r192269.diff.bz2
DM DA
DM DA This diff should apply with no fuzz and no rejects to RELENG_7 as of
DM DA r192386 (2009-05-19 15:33:41 UTC). For earlier or later revisions, no
DM DA warranty.
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
DM DM DA http://www.andric.com/freebsd/zfs13/r192269/zfs_mfc-r192269.diff.bz2
DM DM DA
DM DM DA This diff should apply with no fuzz and no rejects to RELENG_7 as of
DM DM DA r192386 (2009-05-19 15:33:41 UTC). For earlier or later revisions,
no
DM
Many people are happily running an old pool with the new code. I have
done that in a VM and run load over it just to be certain. The tuning
still applies to i386. On amd64 vm backpressure works, but may
actually be too aggressive - shrinking the ARC in favor of the
inactive pages queue.
I
On 2009-05-19 22:10, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
Just to be sure: is the patch based on sys/ hierarchy, and does not touch
others (like sbin/)?
No, it touches stuff in cddl/ too, so you need to build the world. Be
sure to use -E with patch, to cleanup emptied files. E.g.:
patch -d /usr/src -p1
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Dimitry Andric wrote:
DA On 2009-05-19 22:10, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
DA Just to be sure: is the patch based on sys/ hierarchy, and does not touch
DA others (like sbin/)?
DA
DA No, it touches stuff in cddl/ too, so you need to build the world. Be
DA sure to use -E with
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
DM DA Just to be sure: is the patch based on sys/ hierarchy, and does not
touch
DM DA others (like sbin/)?
DM DA
DM DA No, it touches stuff in cddl/ too, so you need to build the world. Be
DM DA sure to use -E with patch, to cleanup emptied
On 2009-05-19 23:08, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
After cleaning /usr/obj and buildworld in single thread I got
/usr/src/cddl/lib/libzfs/../../../sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/acl.h:35:
error: conflicting types for 'aclent_t'
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Dimitry Andric wrote:
DA On 2009-05-19 23:08, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
DA After cleaning /usr/obj and buildworld in single thread I got
DA
DA
/usr/src/cddl/lib/libzfs/../../../sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys/acl.h:35:
DA error: conflicting types for 'aclent_t'
DA
On 2009-05-19 23:57, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
... but then again, on `build all'' phase, I got
=== cddl/sbin/zpool (all)
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=athlon-mp
-I/usr/src/cddl/sbin/zpool/../../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/lib/libzpool/common
I created a branch for a reason. With all the renames applying a patch
is a nightmare. Either use the branch or wait until I do the MFC.
Cheers,
Kip
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Dimitry Andric dimi...@andric.com wrote:
On 2009-05-19 23:57, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
... but then again,
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Kip Macy wrote:
KM I created a branch for a reason. With all the renames applying a patch
KM is a nightmare. Either use the branch or wait until I do the MFC.
Ah well, Kip, thank you for all of your support.
Then, what would you offer for releng_7 users to test your
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Dmitry Morozovsky ma...@rinet.ru wrote:
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Kip Macy wrote:
KM I created a branch for a reason. With all the renames applying a patch
KM is a nightmare. Either use the branch or wait until I do the MFC.
Ah well, Kip, thank you for all of your
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Kip Macy wrote:
KM Ah well, Kip, thank you for all of your support.
KM
KM Then, what would you offer for releng_7 users to test your changes? I'm
more
KM than happy to test, and I'm ready to be unvolved in some clashes resolved,
KM but...
KM
KM Anyway, thank you for
On 2009-05-16 02:02, Kip Macy wrote:
I've MFC'd ZFS v13 to RELENG_7 in a work branch. Please test if you can.
http://svn.freebsd.org/base/user/kmacy/ZFS_MFC/
The standard disclaimers apply. This has only been lightly tested in a
VM. Please do not use it with data you care about at this
Kip,
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Kip Macy wrote:
KM I've MFC'd ZFS v13 to RELENG_7 in a work branch. Please test if you can.
KM
KM http://svn.freebsd.org/base/user/kmacy/ZFS_MFC/
KM
KM The standard disclaimers apply. This has only been lightly tested in a
KM VM. Please do not use it with data you
I will if you can reproduce on this branch. A lot has changed between
ZFS v7 and ZFS v13.
-Kip
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Dmitry Morozovsky ma...@rinet.ru wrote:
Kip,
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Kip Macy wrote:
KM I've MFC'd ZFS v13 to RELENG_7 in a work branch. Please test if you can.
KM
On Sun, 17 May 2009, Kip Macy wrote:
KM I will if you can reproduce on this branch. A lot has changed between
KM ZFS v7 and ZFS v13.
So, if I understand you correctrly, you wish me to upgrade to the latest
sources including RELENG_7 ZFS patches, but do *NOT* upgrade the pool to V13?
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Dmitry Morozovsky ma...@rinet.ru wrote:
On Sun, 17 May 2009, Kip Macy wrote:
KM I will if you can reproduce on this branch. A lot has changed between
KM ZFS v7 and ZFS v13.
So, if I understand you correctrly, you wish me to upgrade to the latest
sources
Kip,
On Sun, 17 May 2009, Kip Macy wrote:
KM KM I will if you can reproduce on this branch. A lot has changed between
KM KM ZFS v7 and ZFS v13.
KM
KM So, if I understand you correctrly, you wish me to upgrade to the latest
KM sources including RELENG_7 ZFS patches, but do *NOT* upgrade the
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 05:02:22PM -0700, Kip Macy wrote:
I've MFC'd ZFS v13 to RELENG_7 in a work branch. Please test if you can.
http://svn.freebsd.org/base/user/kmacy/ZFS_MFC/
The standard disclaimers apply. This has only been lightly tested in a
VM. Please do not use it with
On 5/15/09 8:02 PM, Kip Macy wrote:
I've MFC'd ZFS v13 to RELENG_7 in a work branch. Please test if you can.
http://svn.freebsd.org/base/user/kmacy/ZFS_MFC/
The standard disclaimers apply. This has only been lightly tested in a
VM. Please do not use it with data you care about at this time.
On May 16, 2009, at 8:50 AM, Adam McDougall wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 05:02:22PM -0700, Kip Macy wrote:
I've MFC'd ZFS v13 to RELENG_7 in a work branch. Please test if you
can.
http://svn.freebsd.org/base/user/kmacy/ZFS_MFC/
The standard disclaimers apply. This has only been
I've MFC'd ZFS v13 to RELENG_7 in a work branch. Please test if you can.
http://svn.freebsd.org/base/user/kmacy/ZFS_MFC/
The standard disclaimers apply. This has only been lightly tested in a
VM. Please do not use it with data you care about at this time.
Thanks,
Kip
--
When bad men combine,
33 matches
Mail list logo
