On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 19:01 -0600, Mike Karels wrote:
> > From mike Sun Feb 23 17:24:54 2020
>
>
> Gerard E. Seibert wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 16:27:40 -0600, Mike Karels stated:
> > > In this case (a USB failure), I bisected the problem some
On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 19:01:49 -0600, Mike Karels stated:
>The update to ACPI was pulled from upstream, and IIRC it included
>multiple changes. There have been many updates to ACPI since. I
>don't have any idea which part of the change caused the problem, or
>what it does; no idea how it affects
02.prod.outlook.com
([fe80::518f:ba28:13dd:1f3e%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2750.021; Sun, 23 Feb 2020
23:24:33 +
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 18:24:29 -0500
From: "Gerard E. Seibert"
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD 12.0 end-of-life
Message-ID:
In-R
On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 16:27:40 -0600, Mike Karels stated:
>In this case (a USB failure), I bisected the problem some months ago.
>The offending commit was an ACPI update. I have not yet "downgraded"
>to 11.3, but I will when I have enough time.
Obviously, I am not an expert here, but why can't the
Ed Maste wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 at 12:48, Gerard E. Seibert
> wrote:
> >
> > Until they squash that bug, they should not be in a rush to push out
> > the door another defective model.
> Unfortunately complaining that there's a bug in 12.0 or 12.1 or
> providing additional reports of this
On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 at 12:48, Gerard E. Seibert
wrote:
>
> Until they squash that bug, they should not be in a rush to push out
> the door another defective model.
Unfortunately complaining that there's a bug in 12.0 or 12.1 or
providing additional reports of this will do nothing to help resolve
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 04:23:35 +0100, Tomasz CEDRO stated:
>12.0 was a problematic release. 12.1 brings even more problems.
I agree. 12.0 & 12.1 are both flawed. Neither one will install and run
correctly on certain newer systems.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237666
Until
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 8:24 PM Bengt Ahlgren wrote:
> Tomasz CEDRO writes:
> > Another problem is the VirtualBox virtualization that is not really
> > usable anymore. I am aware of closed-source VBox Guest Additions
> > problem. My VM works fine for a first minute or two but then it stops
> >
Tomasz CEDRO writes:
[...]
> Another problem is the VirtualBox virtualization that is not really
> usable anymore. I am aware of closed-source VBox Guest Additions
> problem. My VM works fine for a first minute or two but then it stops
> when I start working on it. With DRM and Framebuffer X11
Hi all,
> Am 18.02.2020 um 18:44 schrieb Pete French :
> Both the DRM issue and VirtualBox are fixed by making sure you recompile and
> install the kernel modules from the source in /usr/ports when you upgrade the
> OS, or if 'pkg upgrade' overwrites them. Its a bit annnoying, but hardly a
>
On 18/Feb/2020 17:19, Tomasz CEDRO wrot> But also as this DRM user (for
Intel and AMD) I have experienced the
related hiccups, problems, and problems solutions. It does not look
like a FreeBSD way, but more like Linux way. I never noticed anything
like this before. Sure, I can see this only as
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 3:51 PM Ed Maste wrote:
>
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 05:37, Tomasz CEDRO wrote:
> >
> > Maybe its a time to give OpenBSD a try..
>
> I really don't understand this comment, either. Certainly give OpenBSD
> a try and if it fits your needs better that's great.
>
> As far as
Hello Ed, thanks for your input :-)
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 3:46 PM Ed Maste wrote:
> > 12.0 was a problematic release. 12.1 brings even more problems.
>
> The major issue with 12.1 is a problem with the Intel graphics kernel
> module, and fixing that was held up by both 12.0 and 12.1 being
>
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 05:37, Tomasz CEDRO wrote:
>
> Maybe its a time to give OpenBSD a try..
I really don't understand this comment, either. Certainly give OpenBSD
a try and if it fits your needs better that's great.
As far as I'm aware OpenBSD issues a release every six months and
supports
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 22:24, Tomasz CEDRO wrote:
>
> Why so short End-Of-Life? Why so many fast and short releases? What for?
>
> Why pushing problems to production? What was wrong with having one
> well tested stable system for a long time?
I really don't understand this - FreeBSD 12 is
wt., 18 lut 2020, 10:20 użytkownik Steve O'Hara-Smith
napisał:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 04:23:35 +0100
> Tomasz CEDRO wrote:
>
> > Why so short End-Of-Life? Why so many fast and short releases? What for?
>
> The new(ish) release and support policy has been announced and well
> documented,
Why so short End-Of-Life? Why so many fast and short releases? What for?
Why pushing problems to production? What was wrong with having one
well tested stable system for a long time?
12.0 was a problematic release. 12.1 brings even more problems.
To be honest X11 Video Acceleration DRM mess and
17 matches
Mail list logo
