Re: Merging r286233 to stable/10?

2015-11-07 Thread Luigi Rizzo
Request to all: would you mind a brief English summary with this kind of requests? It would attract relevant people's attention much more than a commit id. Cheers Luigi On Saturday, November 7, 2015, Trond Endrestøl < trond.endres...@fagskolen.gjovik.no> wrote: > Hi, > > Would someone please

Re: Merging r286233 to stable/10?

2015-11-07 Thread Kubilay Kocak
On 8/11/2015 12:48 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > Request to all: would you mind a brief English summary with this kind of > requests? It would attract relevant people's attention much more than a > commit id. Yep, this and ideally a Bugzilla issue reference so mfc-stableX flag can be set on the issue,

Re: Merging r286233 to stable/10?

2015-11-07 Thread Kubilay Kocak
On 7/11/2015 10:58 PM, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > Hi, > > Would someone please consider merging r286233 to stable/10? > cc'ing original committer :) ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To

Re: Merging r286233 to stable/10?

2015-11-07 Thread Florian Ermisch
To provide some context for other ppl wondering: > Add missing exception number to EL0 > sync. abort on ARM64 > > When doing a data abort from userland > it is possible to get more than one data > abort inside the same exception level. > Add an appropriate exception number to > allow nesting of

Re: Merging r286233 to stable/10?

2015-11-07 Thread Trond Endrestøl
On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 12:12-, Florian Ermisch wrote: > To provide some context for other ppl wondering: My bad. I meant r286223. This one: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision=286223 -- +---++ | Vennlig hilsen,