On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Sean McNeil wrote:
I have to disagree. Packet loss is likely according to some of my
tests. With the re driver, no change except placing a 100BT setup with
no packet loss to a gigE setup (both linksys switches) will cause
serious packet loss at 20Mbps data rates. I
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 11:34 +, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Sean McNeil wrote:
I have to disagree. Packet loss is likely according to some of my
tests. With the re driver, no change except placing a 100BT setup with
no packet loss to a gigE setup (both linksys switches)
Sean McNeil wrote this message on Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:14 -0800:
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 11:34 +, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Sean McNeil wrote:
I have to disagree. Packet loss is likely according to some of my
tests. With the re driver, no change except placing a
Hi John-Mark,
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 13:31 -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Sean McNeil wrote this message on Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:14 -0800:
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 11:34 +, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Sean McNeil wrote:
I have to disagree. Packet loss is likely
:Increasing the interrupt moderation frequency worked on the re driver,
:but it only made it marginally better. Even without moderation,
:however, I could lose packets without m_defrag. I suspect that there is
:something in the higher level layers that is causing the packet loss. I
:have no
: Yes, I knew that adjusting TCP window size is important to use up a link.
: However I wanted to show adjusting the parameters of Interrupt
: Moderation affects network performance.
:
: And I think a packet loss was occured by enabled Interrupt Moderation.
: The mechanism of a packet loss in
On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 20:42 -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
: Yes, I knew that adjusting TCP window size is important to use up a link.
: However I wanted to show adjusting the parameters of Interrupt
: Moderation affects network performance.
:
: And I think a packet loss was occured by enabled
