On Nov 18, 2019, at 8:06 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
18.11.2019 19:03, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Please point me to right direction for debugging this.
Is it normal that over 1/3rd of 360G total physical RAM is in "Laundry"
category in addition to 173G Wired?
last pid: 20372; load
18.11.2019 19:03, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Please point me to right direction for debugging this.
Is it normal that over 1/3rd of 360G total physical RAM is in "Laundry"
category in addition to 173G Wired?
last pid: 20372; load averages: 8.04, 7.73, 7.84 up
After 2 days of uptime there is a guest that should have only 2GB of RAM but
uses nearly 22G "extra":
# ps -o vsz,rss,command | grep sfile01
29234040 24851428 bhyve: sfile01 (bhyve)
# bhyvectl --vm=sfile01 --get-all | grep -B1 -A1 mem
ID Length Name
0 2048MB sysmem
1 2048KB
16.11.2019 6:24, Xin LI wrote:
> There are several leaks fixed recently, but not all of them were merged back
> to stable/11 (e.g. r341705 which may or may not be related to your issue).
It seems that fix deals with virtio-scsi but all guest systems use virtio-net
and ahci-hd here.
16.11.2019 6:24, Xin LI wrote:
> There are several leaks fixed recently, but not all of them were merged back
> to stable/11 (e.g. r341705 which may or may not be related to your issue).
>
> Personally, I'd recommend updating to 12.x for new features as they are being
> actively developed and
There are several leaks fixed recently, but not all of them were merged
back to stable/11 (e.g. r341705 which may or may not be related to your
issue).
Personally, I'd recommend updating to 12.x for new features as they are
being actively developed and would be supported for about 3 more years
