Re: improper handling of dlpened's C++/atexit() code?

2006-05-22 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Mon, 22 May 2006 06:50:55 +0300 Konstantin Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 06:22:34PM -0400, m m wrote: > > n 5/21/06, Konstantin Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> >Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > >> >0x in ?? () > > >> >(g

Re: improper handling of dlpened's C++/atexit() code?

2006-05-21 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 06:22:34PM -0400, m m wrote: > n 5/21/06, Konstantin Belousov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > >> >0x in ?? () > >> >(gdb) bt > >> >#0 0x in ?? () > >> >#1 0x294c0ad8 in __do_global_dtors_aux () from >

Re: improper handling of dlpened's C++/atexit() code?

2006-05-21 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Sun, 21 May 2006 13:13:35 -0400 "m m" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any hints on this available? Suggestions, more info, anything else? > > On 5/15/06, m m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/14/06, Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 May 2006 20:57:20 -0400 > > > "m m

Re: improper handling of dlpened's C++/atexit() code?

2006-05-21 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:13:35PM -0400, m m wrote: > Any hints on this available? Suggestions, more info, anything else? > > On 5/15/06, m m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On 5/14/06, Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Thu, 11 May 2006 20:57:20 -0400 > >> "m m" <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: improper handling of dlpened's C++/atexit() code?

2006-05-21 Thread m m
Any hints on this available? Suggestions, more info, anything else? On 5/15/06, m m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/14/06, Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 11 May 2006 20:57:20 -0400 > "m m" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am writing in regard to PR at > > http://www.fr

Re: improper handling of dlpened's C++/atexit() code?

2006-05-16 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:58:32PM -0400, m m wrote: > On 5/14/06, Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Thu, 11 May 2006 20:57:20 -0400 > >"m m" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I am writing in regard to PR at > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin%2F59552 . I am > >>

Re: improper handling of dlpened's C++/atexit() code?

2006-05-15 Thread m m
On 5/14/06, Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 11 May 2006 20:57:20 -0400 "m m" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am writing in regard to PR at > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin%2F59552 . I am > experiencing behavior on 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #11: >

Re: improper handling of dlpened's C++/atexit() code?

2006-05-15 Thread m m
You'll need to build ld-elf.so.1 and libc.so.6 to get a sensible backtrace. Can you please point us to a reference on how to do this? I rebuilt the rtld-elf and libc libraries with CFLAGS=-g3 in /etc/make.conf, however the stack trace looks basically the same (missing functions and no line numb

Re: improper handling of dlpened's C++/atexit() code?

2006-05-14 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Thu, 11 May 2006 20:57:20 -0400 "m m" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am writing in regard to PR at > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin%2F59552 . I am > experiencing behavior on 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #11: > Sun Mar 26 00:03:52 EST 2006 which looks a lot like someth

Re: improper handling of dlpened's C++/atexit() code?

2006-05-11 Thread m m
On 5/11/06, Michael Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: /var/log/messages.0.bz2:Apr 26 00:00:04 mail kernel: pid 87211 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 6 /var/log/messages.0.bz2:Apr 26 00:00:04 mail kernel: pid 87208 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 6 /var/log/messages.0.bz2:Apr 26 00:00:04 mail

Re: improper handling of dlpened's C++/atexit() code?

2006-05-11 Thread Michael Butler
m m wrote: I am writing in regard to PR at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin%2F59552 . I am experiencing behavior on 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #11: Sun Mar 26 00:03:52 EST 2006 which looks a lot like something that would be caused by this PR. This happens when apache

Re: improper handling of dlpened's C++/atexit() code?

2006-05-11 Thread pete wright
On 5/11/06, m m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am writing in regard to PR at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin%2F59552 . I am experiencing behavior on 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #11: Sun Mar 26 00:03:52 EST 2006 which looks a lot like something that would be caused by this