On 12 November 2012 00:12, Zoran Kolic zko...@sbb.rs wrote:
It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's
any difference. Are those 3 line the same?
WITH_KMS=YES
WITH_KMS=YES
WITH_KMS=yes
Best regards
In /etc/make.conf it shouldn't matter: they should all
be treated as synonyms
Also, the FreeBSD makefiles and sources test all WITH_* variables with
.ifdef or #ifdef so the value doesn't matter and can even be empty.
This is exactly the point. But I still use 'yes' just for mnemotechnical
reason.
--
View this message in context:
OK - I figured it out.
I have always followed the examples in the handbook. I have also been
bitten more than once when I've typoed, and left out one of the quote
marks.
That tends to leave a lasting impression, as it can be painful to fix,
sometimes requiring to drop into single user mode to
On 12 Nov 2012 05:20, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Zoran Kolic zko...@sbb.rs wrote:
It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's
any difference. Are those 3 line the same?
WITH_KMS=YES
WITH_KMS=YES
WITH_KMS=yes
With regard to their
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 08:29:27AM +, Chris Rees wrote:
On 12 Nov 2012 05:20, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Zoran Kolic zko...@sbb.rs wrote:
It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's
any difference. Are those 3 line the same?
On 12 Nov 2012 08:55, Paul Schenkeveld free...@psconsult.nl wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 08:29:27AM +, Chris Rees wrote:
On 12 Nov 2012 05:20, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Zoran Kolic zko...@sbb.rs wrote:
It might sound stupid, but I'd
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:24:57AM +, Chris Rees wrote:
On 12 Nov 2012 08:55, Paul Schenkeveld free...@psconsult.nl wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 08:29:27AM +, Chris Rees wrote:
On 12 Nov 2012 05:20, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM,
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 Nov 2012 05:20, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Zoran Kolic zko...@sbb.rs wrote:
It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's
any difference. Are those 3 line the
On 12 Nov 2012 15:35, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 Nov 2012 05:20, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Zoran Kolic zko...@sbb.rs wrote:
It might sound stupid, but I'd
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Zoran Kolic zko...@sbb.rs wrote:
It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's
any difference. Are those 3 line the same?
WITH_KMS=YES
WITH_KMS=YES
WITH_KMS=yes
With regard to their use in /etc/rc.conf, no, absolutely not.
In general, from my
WITH_KMS=YES
WITH_KMS=YES
WITH_KMS=yes
With regard to their use in /etc/rc.conf, no, absolutely not.
In general, from my experience, only the second one will work.
Yep, in rc.conf only the second one. I was thinking of make.conf.
It is the place kms should be set. Loader conf might take
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Zoran Kolic zko...@sbb.rs wrote:
WITH_KMS=YES
WITH_KMS=YES
WITH_KMS=yes
With regard to their use in /etc/rc.conf, no, absolutely not.
In general, from my experience, only the second one will work.
Yep, in rc.conf only the second one. I was
12 matches
Mail list logo
