Re: ntpd v4.2 problem

2004-11-24 Thread Kevin Oberman
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:35:46 +0900 From: Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Harlan Stenn wrote: This would be use -g with ntpd and forget about ntpdate. H -- But make sure your clocks are in sink at the start by using date. or add -g with the ntpdate_flags, to

Re: ntpd v4.2 problem

2004-11-23 Thread Yann Golanski
Quoth Evren Yurtesen on Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 16:08:21 -0800 The handbook seem to give wrong information about ntp and the manual page of ntp.conf is ?old? maybe? The notrust option obviously changed between v4.1 and v4.2...

Re: ntpd v4.2 problem

2004-11-23 Thread Evren Yurtesen
Yann Golanski wrote: Quoth Evren Yurtesen on Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 16:08:21 -0800 The handbook seem to give wrong information about ntp and the manual page of ntp.conf is ?old? maybe? The notrust option obviously changed between v4.1 and v4.2...

Re: ntpd v4.2 problem

2004-11-23 Thread Tom Hukins
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 04:08:21PM -0800, Evren Yurtesen wrote: The handbook seem to give wrong information about ntp and the manual page of ntp.conf is ?old? maybe? The notrust option obviously changed between v4.1 and v4.2...

Re: ntpd v4.2 problem

2004-11-23 Thread Evren Yurtesen
Tom Hukins wrote: On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 04:08:21PM -0800, Evren Yurtesen wrote: The handbook seem to give wrong information about ntp and the manual page of ntp.conf is ?old? maybe? The notrust option obviously changed between v4.1 and v4.2...

Re: ntpd v4.2 problem

2004-11-23 Thread Rob
Yann Golanski wrote: Quoth Evren Yurtesen on Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 16:08:21 -0800 The handbook seem to give wrong information about ntp and the manual page of ntp.conf is ?old? maybe? The notrust option obviously changed between v4.1 and v4.2...

Re: ntpd v4.2 problem

2004-11-23 Thread Harlan Stenn
The problem in the manual is different. You do not have any access control in your server, your server is worldwide open to other people changing your runtime configuration etc. (as it seems from your conf file) Wrong - ntpd will never allow changes to itself without explicitly allowing it

Re: ntpd v4.2 problem

2004-11-23 Thread Jason C. Wells
--On Tuesday, November 23, 2004 6:38 PM -0500 Harlan Stenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In 4.1, notrust means do not trust this host/subnet for time. In 4.2, notrust means require crypto auth before believing this host/subnet for time. I have been trying on and off for some time now to figure why my