Re: nve timeout (and down) regression?

2006-03-31 Thread Spil Oss
My home-network is so simple I could just tie the desktop to the server's NIC with a cross-cable (xl 3c905C to nve). Let's see if the 3Com 16-port switch is the culprit! Spil. On 24/03/06, Kevin Oberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:33:17 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu

Re: nve timeout (and down) regression?

2006-03-27 Thread JoaoBR
On Saturday 25 March 2006 08:55, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, David Xu wrote: ÿÿ Saturday 25 March 2006 18:04ÿÿJoaoBR ÿÿ It appears to be a point the machines with problem are all SMP, UP do no show the nve timeout or any other problem with it alias, same with SK, on

Re: nve timeout (and down) regression?

2006-03-25 Thread JoaoBR
On Saturday 25 March 2006 02:29, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: I updated my system (which was happy on Feb. 15 code) to March 13 code and I am still running fine. No errors at all. Also, another system was updated to RELENG_6 yesterday and it is also running clean. Again, all systems are

Re: nve timeout (and down) regression?

2006-03-25 Thread David Xu
在 Saturday 25 March 2006 18:04,JoaoBR 写道: It appears to be a point the machines with problem are all SMP, UP do no show the nve timeout or any other problem with it alias, same with SK, on SMP the system crashes and with UP it's ok João Mine is UP, chipset is NForce3 250GB, current it

Re: nve timeout (and down) regression?

2006-03-25 Thread David G. Lawrence
This happens w/o any real activity on that interface (which goes into an Allied Telesyn switch): ... Mar 24 19:39:54 worf kernel: nve0: device timeout (1) Mar 24 19:39:54 worf kernel: nve0: link state changed to DOWN Mar 24 19:39:55 worf kernel: nve0: link state changed to UP Mar 24

Re: nve timeout (and down) regression?

2006-03-25 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, David Xu wrote: ÿÿ Saturday 25 March 2006 18:04ÿÿJoaoBR ÿÿ It appears to be a point the machines with problem are all SMP, UP do no show the nve timeout or any other problem with it alias, same with SK, on SMP the system crashes and with UP it's ok For sk please try

Re: nve timeout (and down) regression?

2006-03-24 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:34:24 -0800 Kevin Oberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:59:56 + (UTC) From: Bjoern A. Zeeb [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, JoaoBR wrote: On Thursday 23 March 2006 15:59, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: nve did not worked on 6.0R

Re: nve timeout (and down) regression?

2006-03-24 Thread Kevin Oberman
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:33:17 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:34:24 -0800 Kevin Oberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:59:56 + (UTC) From: Bjoern A. Zeeb [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, JoaoBR wrote:

Re: nve timeout (and down) regression?

2006-03-24 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:55:41 -0800 Kevin Oberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:33:17 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:34:24 -0800 Kevin Oberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:59:56 + (UTC) From:

Re: nve timeout (and down) regression?

2006-03-24 Thread David Xu
在 Friday 24 March 2006 02:40,JoaoBR 写道: The other patch cited in the message has never been made: diff -u -r1.7.2.4 if_nve.c --- if_nve.c9 Oct 2005 04:18:17 - 1.7.2.4 +++ if_nve.c27 Oct 2005 09:58:45 - @@ -727,7 +727,7 @@ DEBUGOUT(NVE_DEBUG_INIT, nve:

Re: nve timeout (and down) regression?

2006-03-23 Thread Kevin Oberman
I am a bit confused. The first addition of sc-pending_txs = 0; was MFC'ed back in December by obrien. Check around line 730 of if_nv.c (or whatever it's called in 6.0) sc-linkup = 0; sc-cur_rx = 0; sc-pending_rxs = 0; + sc-pending_txs = 0; This should mostly

Re: nve timeout (and down) regression?

2006-03-23 Thread JoaoBR
On Thursday 23 March 2006 15:29, Kevin Oberman wrote: I am a bit confused. The first addition of sc-pending_txs = 0; was MFC'ed back in December by obrien. Check around line 730 of if_nv.c (or whatever it's called in 6.0) sc-linkup = 0; sc-cur_rx = 0; sc-pending_rxs

Re: nve timeout (and down) regression?

2006-03-23 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, JoaoBR wrote: Hi, The other patch cited in the message has never been made: diff -u -r1.7.2.4 if_nve.c --- if_nve.c9 Oct 2005 04:18:17 - 1.7.2.4 +++ if_nve.c27 Oct 2005 09:58:45 - @@ -727,7 +727,7 @@ DEBUGOUT(NVE_DEBUG_INIT, nve:

Re: nve timeout (and down) regression?

2006-03-23 Thread JoaoBR
On Thursday 23 March 2006 15:59, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: If you have collisions you have most likeely a duplex mismatch. yep, but I set manually matching with the switch and tried other speeds, no change If you read the code and I remember right the above change is a NOP. anyway, resolved

Re: nve timeout (and down) regression?

2006-03-23 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, JoaoBR wrote: On Thursday 23 March 2006 15:59, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: nve did not worked on 6.0R (for me) but cvsup to stable resolved the case (for me) in end of dezember since a month or so with recent releng_6 the problem came back, timeouts and stopping rx/tx did you

Re: nve timeout (and down) regression?

2006-03-23 Thread JoaoBR
On Thursday 23 March 2006 18:59, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, JoaoBR wrote: On Thursday 23 March 2006 15:59, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: nve did not worked on 6.0R (for me) but cvsup to stable resolved the case (for me) in end of dezember since a month or so with recent

Re: nve timeout (and down) regression?

2006-03-23 Thread Kevin Oberman
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:59:56 + (UTC) From: Bjoern A. Zeeb [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, JoaoBR wrote: On Thursday 23 March 2006 15:59, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: nve did not worked on 6.0R (for me) but cvsup to stable resolved the case (for me) in end of dezember