On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:38:23AM +0200, Mark Huizer wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 12:01:07AM +0200, Wolfgang Zenker wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after updating some 10-STABLE systems a few days ago, I noticed that on
> > two of those systems bsnmpd started to use up a lot of cpu time, and the
> >
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 12:01:07AM +0200, Wolfgang Zenker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after updating some 10-STABLE systems a few days ago, I noticed that on
> two of those systems bsnmpd started to use up a lot of cpu time, and the
> available memory shrinked until rendering the system unusable. Killing
>
On Mon, 2 May 2016 09:10+0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> On Mon, 2 May 2016 00:01+0200, Wolfgang Zenker wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > after updating some 10-STABLE systems a few days ago, I noticed that on
> > two of those systems bsnmpd started to use up a lot of cpu time, and the
> > available
On Mon, 2 May 2016 00:01+0200, Wolfgang Zenker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after updating some 10-STABLE systems a few days ago, I noticed that on
> two of those systems bsnmpd started to use up a lot of cpu time, and the
> available memory shrinked until rendering the system unusable. Killing
> bsnmpd
Hi,
after updating some 10-STABLE systems a few days ago, I noticed that on
two of those systems bsnmpd started to use up a lot of cpu time, and the
available memory shrinked until rendering the system unusable. Killing
bsnmpd stops the cpu usage but does not free up memory.
Both affected systems
