Re: Sandisk CloudSpeed Gen. II Eco Channel SSD vs ZFS = we're in hell

2016-11-29 Thread Steven Hartland
On 29/11/2016 12:30, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: Hi. On 28.11.2016 23:07, Steven Hartland wrote: Check your gstat with -dp so you also see deletes, it may be that your drives have a very slow TRIM. Indeed, I see a bunch of delete operations, and when TRIM disabled my engineers report that the

Re: Sandisk CloudSpeed Gen. II Eco Channel SSD vs ZFS = we're in hell

2016-11-29 Thread Eugene M. Zheganin
Hi. On 28.11.2016 23:07, Steven Hartland wrote: > Check your gstat with -dp so you also see deletes, it may be that your > drives have a very slow TRIM. > Indeed, I see a bunch of delete operations, and when TRIM disabled my engineers report that the performance is greatly increasing. Is this it

Re: Sandisk CloudSpeed Gen. II Eco Channel SSD vs ZFS = we're in hell

2016-11-28 Thread Steven Hartland
Check your gstat with -dp so you also see deletes, it may be that your drives have a very slow TRIM. On 28/11/2016 17:54, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: Hi, recently we bough a bunch of "Sandisk CloudSpeed Gen. II Eco Channel" disks (the model name by itself should already made me suspicious) for

Sandisk CloudSpeed Gen. II Eco Channel SSD vs ZFS = we're in hell

2016-11-28 Thread Eugene M. Zheganin
Hi, recently we bough a bunch of "Sandisk CloudSpeed Gen. II Eco Channel" disks (the model name by itself should already made me suspicious) for using with zfs SAN on FreeBSD, we're plugged them into the LSI SAS3008 and now we are experiencing the performance that I would call "literally