On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 05:08:10PM +0100, Greg Byshenk wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
The rest of the below information is good -- but I'm confused about
something: is there anyone out there who can use mksnap_ffs on a
filesystem (/usr is a good
Jeremy,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:41:02AM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:47:35PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
I run the mksnap_ffs command
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:05:21PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:02:50PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
...
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
I've been playing
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:26:42PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:41:02AM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:47:35PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 02:45:14AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:26:42PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:41:02AM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:41:02AM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:47:35PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
I've been playing around with
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
The rest of the below information is good -- but I'm confused about
something: is there anyone out there who can use mksnap_ffs on a
filesystem (/usr is a good test source) and NOT experience this
deadlocking problem?
Kostik Belousov writes:
| On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 02:45:14AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
[snip]
| If he can press Control-T, it means SIGINFO can be sent to the
| mksnap_ffs process, and the process responds with that information. So,
| the system is not deadlocked -- meaning, I
I'll just chime in briefly. I contacted Jeremy off the list
about this issue a few days ago. I have one spare box i386
sitting here that I can happily test patches against; if I
can be of help, let me know.
uname -a
FreeBSD localhost.localdomain 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #0:
Tue
I've been playing around with snapshots lately but I've got a problem on
one of my servers running 7-STABLE amd64:
FreeBSD paladin 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #8: Mon Nov 10 20:49:51
GMT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PALADIN amd64
I run the mksnap_ffs command to take
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Bishop
Sent: 12 November 2008 07:58 PM
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: System deadlock when using mksnap_ffs
FreeBSD paladin 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 06:22:35PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:10:50PM +0200, David Peall wrote:
FreeBSD paladin 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #8: Mon Nov 10
20:49:51 GMT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PALADIN amd64
I run the mksnap_ffs
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
I've been playing around with snapshots lately but I've got a problem on
one of my servers running 7-STABLE amd64:
FreeBSD paladin 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #8: Mon Nov 10 20:49:51
GMT 2008 [EMAIL
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
I run the mksnap_ffs command to take the snapshot and some time later
the system completely freezes up:
paladin# cd /u2/.snap/
paladin# mksnap_ffs /u2 test.1
Someone (not named because they choose not to reply to the list) gave me
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 07:49:28PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
I run the mksnap_ffs command to take the snapshot and some time later
the system completely freezes up:
paladin# cd /u2/.snap/
paladin# mksnap_ffs /u2 test.1
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:10:50PM +0200, David Peall wrote:
FreeBSD paladin 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #8: Mon Nov 10
20:49:51 GMT 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PALADIN amd64
I run the mksnap_ffs command to take the snapshot and some time later
the system
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:47:35PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
I've been playing around with snapshots lately but I've got a problem on
one of my servers running 7-STABLE amd64:
FreeBSD paladin 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:41:02AM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:47:35PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
I've been playing around with snapshots lately but I've got a problem on
one of my servers running
Jeremy Chadwick writes:
[snip]
| The rest of the below information is good -- but I'm confused about
| something: is there anyone out there who can use mksnap_ffs on a
| filesystem (/usr is a good test source) and NOT experience this
| deadlocking problem? Literally *every* FreeBSD box I
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
...
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
I've been playing around with snapshots lately but I've got a problem on
one of my servers running 7-STABLE amd64:
FreeBSD paladin 7.1-PRERELEASE
Kostik Belousov writes:
| On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 07:49:28PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
| On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
| I run the mksnap_ffs command to take the snapshot and some time later
| the system completely freezes up:
|
| paladin# cd /u2/.snap/
|
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:02:50PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
...
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
I've been playing around with snapshots lately but I've got a problem
on
one of
Quoting Jeremy Chadwick, who wrote on Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 08:42:00PM -0800 ..
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:41:02AM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 09:47:35PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 05:58:26PM +, Tim Bishop wrote:
I've been playing around
On 2008-Nov-12 20:47:37 -0800, Doug Ambrisko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I plan to commit it tomorrow since I sent it to Tim to test. The 10 can
be tuned but it has kept a bunch of machines at work up. Glad people
don't think it is that it is to wrong :-) It probably could be made
a little more
(moving my thread from -fs to -stable)
Before touching anything, here's a description of the symptoms I
see... Rather busy system, with quite a bit of filesystem activity
occurring while the snapshot is being made. Quad CPU amd64 box with
16GB of ram, 6x10Krpm RAID array. Should be
25 matches
Mail list logo
