On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:40:57 +1100, Peter Jeremy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-Jan-07 00:20:12 +0100, Lukas Ertl wrote:
Nevermind. It seems I now explicitely need
cpu I686_CPU
in my kernel.
You should have always needed that.
Interestingly, I didn't have it in the old kernel,
Hello,
5.3-STABLE refuses to recognize my VIA C3 CPU, it panics immediately
after the loader with
CPU class not configured
Last known working kernel is from Sun Nov 7 16:27:23 CET 2004, it
recognizes the CPU as
CPU: VIA C3 Samuel 2 (601.37-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = CentaurHauls Id =
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:36:43 +0100, Lukas Ertl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5.3-STABLE refuses to recognize my VIA C3 CPU, it panics immediately
after the loader with
CPU class not configured
Nevermind. It seems I now explicitely need
cpu I686_CPU
in my kernel.
thanks,
le
Am 06.01.2005 um 23:36 schrieb Lukas Ertl:
Hello,
5.3-STABLE refuses to recognize my VIA C3 CPU, it panics immediately
after the loader with
CPU class not configured
Last known working kernel is from Sun Nov 7 16:27:23 CET 2004, it
recognizes the CPU as
CPU: VIA C3 Samuel 2 (601.37-MHz 686-class
On Thu, 2005-Jan-06 23:36:43 +0100, Lukas Ertl wrote:
5.3-STABLE refuses to recognize my VIA C3 CPU, it panics immediately
after the loader with
CPU class not configured
Last known working kernel is from Sun Nov 7 16:27:23 CET 2004, it
recognizes the CPU as
CPU: VIA C3 Samuel 2 (601.37-MHz
On Fri, 2005-Jan-07 00:20:12 +0100, Lukas Ertl wrote:
Nevermind. It seems I now explicitely need
cpu I686_CPU
in my kernel.
You should have always needed that.
--
Peter Jeremy
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
