On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 07:29:24PM +0300, Dan Naumov typed:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Rick C.
Pettyrick-freebsd2...@kiwi-computer.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:24:51AM +0200, Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 04:20:45PM -0500, Rick C. Petty typed:
On Mon, Jul 06,
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 04:20:45PM -0500, Rick C. Petty typed:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 11:39:04AM +0200, Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:46:50AM +0200, Dimitry Andric typed:
Right, so it's a lot bigger on amd64. I guess those 64-bit pointers
aren't entirely free. :)
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:24:51AM +0200, Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 04:20:45PM -0500, Rick C. Petty typed:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 11:39:04AM +0200, Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:46:50AM +0200, Dimitry Andric typed:
Right, so it's a lot bigger
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Rick C.
Pettyrick-freebsd2...@kiwi-computer.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:24:51AM +0200, Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 04:20:45PM -0500, Rick C. Petty typed:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 11:39:04AM +0200, Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Mon, Jul
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 12:38:34AM +0100, Ian J Hart typed:
I just had an installworld fail due to this (/rescue).
Given that many people will have chosen the default root size offered
by sysinstall a different build default would seem prudent.
In any case sysinstall needs to be
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 09:39:41AM +0200, Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 12:38:34AM +0100, Ian J Hart typed:
I just had an installworld fail due to this (/rescue).
Given that many people will have chosen the default root size offered
by sysinstall a different
On 2009-07-06 09:42, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
#define ROOT_DEFAULT_SIZE 512
IMHO it is not. If you install a kernel with *.symbols present
twice (i.e. kernel and kernel.old contain symbol files), your
root partition will be 95% full.
I'm not sure how you arrive at this
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Dimitry Andricdimi...@andric.com wrote:
On 2009-07-06 09:42, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
#define ROOT_DEFAULT_SIZE 512
IMHO it is not. If you install a kernel with *.symbols present
twice (i.e. kernel and kernel.old contain symbol files), your
root
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:34:41AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
I'm not sure how you arrive at this number; even with -CURRENT (on i386,
with all debug symbols), I could store about 4 complete kernels on such
a filesystem:
$ du -hs /boot/kernel*
122M/boot/kernel
I get about the same on
On 2009-07-06 10:41, Dan Naumov wrote:
atom# uname -a
FreeBSD atom.localdomain 7.2-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p1 #0: Tue
Jun 9 18:02:21 UTC 2009
r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
atom# du -hs /boot/kernel*
205M/boot/kernel
Right, so it's a lot
I'm not sure how you arrive at this number; even with -CURRENT (on i386,
with all debug symbols), I could store about 4 complete kernels on such
a filesystem:
$ du -hs /boot/kernel*
122M /boot/kernel
atom# du -hs /boot/kernel*
205M/boot/kernel
i386: 127 meg
amd64: 208 meg
Hi there Patrick,
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
PMH 7.2-System:
PMH ---
PMH makeoptions DEBUG=-g
PMH
PMH $ du -sk /boot/kernel
PMH 214778 /boot/kernel
PMH
PMH Lots of those files filling /boot/kernel.
PMH
PMH
PMH On a current server with 512 MB /, the
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:46:50AM +0200, Dimitry Andric typed:
On 2009-07-06 10:41, Dan Naumov wrote:
atom# uname -a
FreeBSD atom.localdomain 7.2-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p1 #0: Tue
Jun 9 18:02:21 UTC 2009
r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
On 2009-07-06 11:39, Ruben de Groot wrote:
r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
atom# du -hs /boot/kernel*
205M/boot/kernel
Right, so it's a lot bigger on amd64. I guess those 64-bit pointers
aren't entirely free. :)
I'm not sure where the size
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 11:39:04AM +0200, Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:46:50AM +0200, Dimitry Andric typed:
Right, so it's a lot bigger on amd64. I guess those 64-bit pointers
aren't entirely free. :)
I'm not sure where the size difference comes from. I have some
Quoting Patrick M. Hausen hau...@punkt.de:
Hi!
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 05:05:08PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
E.g. the debug stuff is put into the .symbols files. The kernel itself
still contains the function and data names, though:
Understood. Thanks. No, I don't want the kernel to be
Hi, all,
When I upgraded some of our machines from 6.x to 7.2
I noticed that the root filesystems seemed to fill up.
I thought this might come from
makeoptions DEBUG=-g
in the kernel config, but somehow that doesn't make sense,
since our older systems have the same option present.
On 2009-07-03 16:25, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
On a current server with 512 MB /, the filesystem is at
97% after installing a new kernel twice. Can I get rid of
these files somehow or are they necessary, in which case
I will need way bigger root filesystems?
I mean, get rid automatically and
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 04:35:54PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
You can find this in /usr/src/UPDATING:
20060118:
This actually occured some time ago, but installing the kernel
now also installs a bunch of symbol files for the kernel modules.
This increases
On 2009-07-03 16:41, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
But I thought, they were in the kernel itself?
%file /boot/kernel/kernel
/boot/kernel/kernel: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD),
dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped
not stripped - i.e. with debug symbols.
Hi!
On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 05:05:08PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
E.g. the debug stuff is put into the .symbols files. The kernel itself
still contains the function and data names, though:
Understood. Thanks. No, I don't want the kernel to be void
of any information ;-)
Kind regards,
21 matches
Mail list logo
