On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Andy Farkas wrote:
>> There's still plenty of laptops that would be crippled if these were
>> removed.
>>
>
> Indeed:
>
> dc0: port 0x1000-0x10ff mem
> 0x8800-0x880003ff irq 11 at device 0.0 on cardbus1
>
> -andyf
>
Just to be clear, I'm not suggesting to ret
There's still plenty of laptops that would be crippled if these were removed.
Indeed:
dc0: port 0x1000-0x10ff mem
0x8800-0x880003ff irq 11 at device 0.0 on cardbus1
-andyf
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
> In reference to this FreeBSD forums post:
> http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?p=231135&postcount=4
> Would it be a good time to remove those from GENERIC since the
> hardware they are for is becoming so seriously outdated?
> There's always an option to load those drivers a
On Aug 29, 2013, at 10:14 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> .. after tinkering in the USB world, i wonder what's wrong with this:
>
> * created a basic markup / description language to encapsulate what PCI/USB
> probing requires;
> * generated both config files _and_ .c / .h files for drivers to includ
.. after tinkering in the USB world, i wonder what's wrong with this:
* created a basic markup / description language to encapsulate what PCI/USB
probing requires;
* generated both config files _and_ .c / .h files for drivers to include;
* have the kernel build process do .device_description -> .c
On 08/29/13 11:52, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Aug 29, 2013, at 3:15 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
>
>> In reference to this FreeBSD forums post:
>>
>> http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?p=231135&postcount=4
>>
>> Would it be a good time to remove those from GENERIC since the
>> hardware they are for i
On Aug 29, 2013, at 3:15 AM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> In reference to this FreeBSD forums post:
>
> http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?p=231135&postcount=4
>
> Would it be a good time to remove those from GENERIC since the
> hardware they are for is becoming so seriously outdated?
>
> There
On Aug 29, 2013, at 8:54 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, August 29, 2013 6:56:53 am Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Hm! Are they dynamically loaded if you insert the cards?
>>
>> (Ie, has devd been taught about them as appropriate?)
>
> These are drivers for the bridges, not for cards you plug in
On Thursday, August 29, 2013 6:56:53 am Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hm! Are they dynamically loaded if you insert the cards?
>
> (Ie, has devd been taught about them as appropriate?)
These are drivers for the bridges, not for cards you plug into the bridges.
If you autoloaded them at all you would lo
Hm! Are they dynamically loaded if you insert the cards?
(Ie, has devd been taught about them as appropriate?)
-adrian
On 29 August 2013 02:15, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> In reference to this FreeBSD forums post:
>
> http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?p=231135&postcount=4
>
> Would it be a
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:15:17 +0300, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> To: FreeBSD current ,
> "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" ,
> freebsd-hardw...@freebsd.org
Just to -stable, as the OP in that forum post's thread was well advised.
> In reference to this FreeBSD forums post:
>
> http://forums.f
In reference to this FreeBSD forums post:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?p=231135&postcount=4
Would it be a good time to remove those from GENERIC since the
hardware they are for is becoming so seriously outdated?
There's always an option to load those drivers as modules if needed.
-Kim
12 matches
Mail list logo
