Re: Why not provide libclang.so in base?

2012-07-26 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:31:04AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-07-18 14:54, Yanhui Shen wrote: > > I'm using clang-complete plugin in vim, > > it claims with libclang.so instead of bin/clang it works better. > > > > However libclang.so is not installed by a default "make buildworld && m

Re: Why not provide libclang.so in base?

2012-07-19 Thread Dimitry Andric
functionality in base, which is why it is in a port. The same applies if you want the latest version, or if you want to build with any specialized options. > So why not provide "libclang.so" in base directly? > I think if it's not a general component, provide a flag something l

Why not provide libclang.so in base?

2012-07-18 Thread Yanhui Shen
ve to install lang/clang *again* from ports to acquire the "libclang.so". So why not provide "libclang.so" in base directly? I think if it's not a general component, provide a flag something like "WITH_LIBCLANG=YES" is also fine. -- Best regards, Yanhui Shen