Hi,
i have relatively early updated my XFree to Xorg. In Version 6.7.x
it has an problematic driver for Intel's Ich2 I815 Graphik-Card.
The Developers say's this should be fixed in 6.8.1, may i have seen that
it's not really. The failures are a little bit less then fromer with
6.7.x but it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:21:39 -0800, Kevin Oberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say something is very wrong on your systems and I'd ALMOST bet it's
ata related. Maybe ATA-MkIII would help things out.
Possibly, altho' I doubt it given that the only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:32:02 -0500 (EST), Jeff Roberson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the process that does the FFT in kernel, niced, or rtprio'd?
last pid: 93131; load averages: 0.96, 0.49, 0.24 up 0+05:18:20 15:29:47
48 processes: 2 running,
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:24:58 +0100
From: Godwin Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:21:39 -0800, Kevin Oberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say something is very wrong on your systems and I'd ALMOST bet it's
ata related. Maybe ATA-MkIII would
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:36:11 +0100
From: Godwin Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:32:02 -0500 (EST), Jeff Roberson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the process that does the FFT in kernel, niced, or
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Oberman
Sent: 3/2/2005 10:45:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Xorg 6.8.1 and SCHED_ULE vs. SCHED_4BSD
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:36:11 +0100
From: Godwin Stewart
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:21:07 -0800, Kevin Oberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please DON'T top post to any FreeBSD list!
Who was top-posting? I certainly wasn't! I hate that moronic practice with
a vengeance.
Only mildly less annoying is people
On Monday, 28. February 2005 03:25, Gary Kline wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 11:36:43AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:12, Gary Kline wrote:
How about adjusting the configuration then?
There is utterly no xorg.conf file; the xorg probes
set the resolution
6.8.1 breaks vt-
switching for me.
Well, I decided to bite the bullet and upgraded to Xorg 6.8.1 anyway. It
didn't break vt-switching for me, thankfully. Other than the core keyboard
driver being kbd instead of Keyboard now, which threw me off for a
couple of minutes, all went well. It seems
:
I've been using that for a long time now, since Xorg 6.8.1 breaks vt-
switching for me.
Well, I decided to bite the bullet and upgraded to Xorg 6.8.1 anyway. It
didn't break vt-switching for me, thankfully. Other than the core keyboard
driver being kbd instead of Keyboard now, which threw me
On Sunday, 27. February 2005 02:06, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:12, Gary Kline wrote:
How about adjusting the configuration then?
There is utterly no xorg.conf file; the xorg probes
set the resolution to the max (1600x1200), and the
display `quivers' --for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:49:00 +0100, Michael Nottebrock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using that for a long time now, since Xorg 6.8.1 breaks vt-
switching for me.
Well, I decided to bite the bullet and upgraded to Xorg 6.8.1 anyway. It
didn't
to upgrade
anything other than portname.
Now, if I could be certain that Xorg has settled down, I wouldn't
mind upgrading from 6.7.0 to 6.8.1 and have done with it.
I've been using Xorg 6.8.1 since a week after it hit the ports tree.
First on 5.3-RELEASE and then on 6-CURRENT (same laptop). No problems
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 11:36:43AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:12, Gary Kline wrote:
How about adjusting the configuration then?
There is utterly no xorg.conf file; the xorg probes
set the resolution to the max (1600x1200), and the
display `quivers'
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:55, Gary Kline wrote:
FYI X.Org should have just used your XF86-4 config file by default.
XF86Config bombed instantly, even with startx.
This afternoon after hours of testing one-change-at-a-time
I found that the DefaultDepth of 8 is at least one
Godwin Stewart napisa(a):
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:49:00 +0100, Michael Nottebrock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using that for a long time now, since Xorg 6.8.1 breaks vt-
switching for me.
One of the things I've been doing is to record some of my old cassettes
(you know, those old plastic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What is the current status of Xorg 6.8.1?
ISTR not that long ago - when ports were updated from 6.7.0 - people were
reporting random freezes and crashes with the new version of Xorg. This
seems to have died down now so I might consider the update
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:36, Godwin Stewart wrote:
ISTR not that long ago - when ports were updated from 6.7.0 - people were
reporting random freezes and crashes with the new version of Xorg. This
seems to have died down now so I might consider the update, which might not
be a bad idea given how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:25:24 +1030, Daniel O'Connor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't need to update a port just because it depends on Xorg. The X
API is quite stable so you can update just Xorg without expecting any
problems. (I did XFree86 -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 10:25:24PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:36, Godwin Stewart wrote:
ISTR not that long ago - when ports were updated from 6.7.0 - people were
reporting random freezes and crashes with the new version
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:35, Godwin Stewart wrote:
No, the problem's the other way round. Every time I want to portupgrade
something else, portupgrade also wants to upgrade Xorg. I don't want the
latest Xorg after the horror stories I heard.
That's why I'm building firefox-1.0.1 independently
-*',
'xorg-*',
'imake-*',
]
I've been using that for a long time now, since Xorg 6.8.1 breaks vt-switching
for me.
--
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org
\u/ | K Desktop Environment
, find the HOLD_PKGS = [ line and change it
to
HOLD_PKGS = [
'bsdpan-*',
'xorg-*',
'imake-*',
]
I've been using that for a long time now, since Xorg 6.8.1 breaks
vt-switching
for me.
Tweaking pkgtools.conf may help me if I move back to XFree,
and it's
also wants to upgrade Xorg.
edit /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf, find the HOLD_PKGS = [ line and change
it to
HOLD_PKGS = [
'bsdpan-*',
'xorg-*',
'imake-*',
]
I've been using that for a long time now, since Xorg 6.8.1 breaks
vt-switching for me
, portupgrade also wants to upgrade
Xorg.
edit /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf, find the HOLD_PKGS = [ line and
change it to
HOLD_PKGS = [
'bsdpan-*',
'xorg-*',
'imake-*',
]
I've been using that for a long time now, since Xorg 6.8.1 breaks
vt-switching for me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:49:00 +0100, Michael Nottebrock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
edit /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf, find the HOLD_PKGS = [ line and change
it to
HOLD_PKGS = [
'bsdpan-*',
'xorg-*',
'imake-*',
]
That's a useful
using that for a long time now, since Xorg 6.8.1 breaks
vt-switching for me.
Tweaking pkgtools.conf may help me if I move back to XFree,
and it's looking like I have no choice. xorg autoconfigs
itself to run at too high a res and nothing I do fixes it.
How about adjusting
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 01:38:22PM -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
Try setting in /etc/make.conf
X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=xfree86-4
There is an entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING about it.
Upgrading with sysutils/portmanager should be able to reset all of your
dependencies after that.
On Saturday 26 February 2005 02:49 pm, you wrote:
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 01:38:22PM -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
Try setting in /etc/make.conf
X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=xfree86-4
There is an entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING about it.
Upgrading with sysutils/portmanager should be able to reset
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:12, Gary Kline wrote:
How about adjusting the configuration then?
There is utterly no xorg.conf file; the xorg probes
set the resolution to the max (1600x1200), and the
display `quivers' --for lack of a better word. So far
my attemps with
-*',
]
I've been using that for a long time now, since Xorg 6.8.1 breaks
vt-switching for me.
Tweaking pkgtools.conf may help me if I move back to XFree,
and it's looking like I have no choice. xorg autoconfigs
itself to run at too high a res and nothing I do fixes it.
How about
Hello,
Is there anyone running this combination successfully.
It has given me different errors a different times and
presently it gives (EE) R128: DFP no detected.
The same card works ok in FreeBSD 5.2.1
Thanks for your help
__
Do You Yahoo!?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:08:12 -0800 (PST), jag [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anyone running this combination successfully.
It has given me different errors a different times and
presently it gives (EE) R128: DFP no detected.
It always does.
jag wrote:
Hello,
Is there anyone running this combination successfully.
It has given me different errors a different times and
presently it gives (EE) R128: DFP no detected.
The same card works ok in FreeBSD 5.2.1
I don't have any problem with the following config :
- FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE (Dec.
34 matches
Mail list logo
