Re: bhyve regression ? (resolved with r356500)

2020-01-08 Thread mike tancsa
On 1/8/2020 12:33 PM, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On 20. 1. 8., mike tancsa wrote: >> On 1/8/2020 10:15 AM, mike tancsa wrote: >>> Going from a kernel from Dec 21st to today, my bhyve image no longer >>> starts up.  Is this possibly related to the mfc 356471 ? >>> >>> >> OK, confirmed.  Doing a svnlite

Re: bhyve regression ?

2020-01-08 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On 20. 1. 8., mike tancsa wrote: > On 1/8/2020 10:15 AM, mike tancsa wrote: >> Going from a kernel from Dec 21st to today, my bhyve image no longer >> starts up.  Is this possibly related to the mfc 356471 ? >> >> > OK, confirmed.  Doing a svnlite update -r356469, to just before the ACPI > MFC

Re: bhyve regression ?

2020-01-08 Thread mike tancsa
On 1/8/2020 10:15 AM, mike tancsa wrote: > Going from a kernel from Dec 21st to today, my bhyve image no longer > starts up.  Is this possibly related to the mfc 356471 ? > > OK, confirmed.  Doing a svnlite update -r356469, to just before the ACPI MFC allows be to start up my bhyve image.    

bhyve regression ?

2020-01-08 Thread mike tancsa
Going from a kernel from Dec 21st to today, my bhyve image no longer starts up.  Is this possibly related to the mfc 356471 ? /boot/kernel/kernel text=0x948ee3 data=0x13d9b8+0x463b10 syms=[0x8+0xef220+0x8+0x10ec23] /boot/entropy size=0x1000 Booting... /tmp/bhyve.e6GT9mY 61: [0001]