-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16 Jan 2007, at 20:09, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Additionally, i could not find a way to make the flash plugin
work, which is a major annoyance given the amount of flash content
that one finds in the services i use daily (some work related too).
On 2007-01-17, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 January 2007 at 3:16:44 +0100, Roland Smith wrote:
Personally I like tabbed browsing a lot, but different strokes for
different folks.
It probably depends on your window manager. Tabs are a reasonable
workaround for window
[sorry if i don't post this to -ports, but i feel
that this is really a -stable issue as it affects
one widely used port]
I am not sure if i am the only one, but on RELENG_6,
linux-firefox 2 is basically unusable (see details below),
while linux-firefox 1.5 is at least usable (even though
it has
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 01:06:45 -0800
Luigi Rizzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible to resurrect the linux-firefox 1.5
port (under a separate name) so at least people have a choice
on which set of bugs they prefer ?
What makes native firefox unsuitable for you?
--
Regards,
Torfinn
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 07:37:22PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 01:06:45 -0800
Luigi Rizzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible to resurrect the linux-firefox 1.5
port (under a separate name) so at least people have a choice
on which set of bugs they
-
From: Luigi Rizzo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Torfinn Ingolfsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 8:09 PM
Subject: Re: can we resurrect linux-firefox-1.5 ?
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 07:37:22PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 01:06:45
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:09:35 -0800
Luigi Rizzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the many times i tried (up to a few months ago and with 1.0.5 or
1.0.7) it crashed randomly while browsing, within a few hours of use,
and this was enough for me to give up.
First: I find that running native firefox
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:14:41PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
...
If linux-firefox isn't working for youhere, I really don't have any
The 1.5.x version _is_ working for me. It is 2.0.x that
exhibits severe problems.
My complaint (to get back on the topic) is that 1.5 disappeared from
the
If you had any idea how many RFC's IE violates and and how many bugs there
are in it you would never have made a statement like that.
I don't think here ever said that IE was *better*, just that it was
necessary for certain sites (which is undeniably true) and that if
all you have available is
On 1/16/07, Luigi Rizzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So i am just advocating to keep the stable version around while
the current one becomes stable enough.
You can get that port back to a specific date (e.g. with
sysutils/portdowngrade) and reinstall the version which better applies
your needs.
Hello,
linux-firefox-2.0.0.1 works fine for me. Cheers, -vlado
vlado.srv# uname -a
FreeBSD srv.g1.netng.org 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #1: Fri
Nov 3 20:20:33 CET 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usrmnt/src/sys/SRV i386
vlado.srv# ll /var/db/pkg/ | grep firefox
drwxr-xr-x 2 root
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 11:41:22PM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
On 1/16/07, Luigi Rizzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So i am just advocating to keep the stable version around while
the current one becomes stable enough.
You can get that port back to a specific date (e.g. with
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:07:39PM +, Pete French wrote:
If you had any idea how many RFC's IE violates and and how many bugs there
are in it you would never have made a statement like that.
I don't think here ever said that IE was *better*, just that it was
necessary for certain
On 2007-01-16, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
The 1.5.x version _is_ working for me. It is 2.0.x that
exhibits severe problems.
I was surprised and annoyed when I found that the reasonably reliable
1.5.x version had been replaced by 2.0, partly because I expected it to
be less reliable and partly because
On Wednesday, 17 January 2007 at 9:56:51 +1000, Greg Black wrote:
On 2007-01-16, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
The 1.5.x version _is_ working for me. It is 2.0.x that
exhibits severe problems.
I was surprised and annoyed when I found that the reasonably reliable
1.5.x version had been replaced by
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:37:53AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
I can't agree. It has hijacked some keys used by Wikipedia (alt-S,
alt-P), and so far I've found it impossible to disable tabs, something
that was barely possible under 1.5. Tell me how to fix that and I'll
be marginally
On Wednesday, 17 January 2007 at 3:16:44 +0100, Roland Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:37:53AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
I can't agree. It has hijacked some keys used by Wikipedia (alt-S,
alt-P), and so far I've found it impossible to disable tabs, something
that was barely
17 matches
Mail list logo
