On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 10:24 PM Graham Menhennitt
wrote:
> Not that it's at all relevant to the question here, but...
>
> It does mostly work without em in the 12 kernel - I'm not sure how, but
> it does.
>
> I upgraded to 12-stable via source but didn't add em to my custom
> kernel. Most things
On 4/7/2019 6:49 AM, Matthew Macy wrote:
On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 1:23 PM Michael Butler
wrote:
I'd be interested to see if substituting the port net/intel-em-kmod
has any effect on the issue,
I would as well. igb, em, and lem are all the same driver in 12. This
makes maintenance a lot easier.
Not that it's at all relevant to the question here, but...
It does mostly work without em in the 12 kernel - I'm not sure how, but
it does.
I upgraded to 12-stable via source but didn't add em to my custom
kernel. Most things worked - basic network functionality. But I had
problems with
On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 1:23 PM Michael Butler
wrote:
>
> On 2019-04-06 08:58, Kris von Mach wrote:
> > On 4/6/2019 2:56 AM, Pete French wrote:
> >> Something odd going on there there - I am using 12-STABLE and I have
> >> igb just fine, and it attaches to the same hardware that 11 did:
> >
> > I
On 2019-04-06 08:58, Kris von Mach wrote:
> On 4/6/2019 2:56 AM, Pete French wrote:
>> Something odd going on there there - I am using 12-STABLE and I have
>> igb just fine, and it attaches to the same hardware that 11 did:
>
> I ran apache bench, and I got a result of 100 requests/sec on
On 4/6/2019 2:56 AM, Pete French wrote:
Something odd going on there there - I am using 12-STABLE and I have
igb just fine, and it attaches to the same hardware that 11 did:
I ran apache bench, and I got a result of 100 requests/sec on 12-STABLE
vs 16,000 requests/sec on 11-STABLE. So
On 4/6/2019 2:56 AM, Pete French wrote:
Something odd going on there there - I am using 12-STABLE and I have
igb just fine, and it attaches to the same hardware that 11 did:
It does work in 12, throughput is great, just that the latency is higher
than 11.
igb0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
On 05/04/2019 16:01, Kris von Mach wrote:
I've upgraded from Stable 11 to Stable 12, and noticed that igb has been
removed and is now part of em driver. However, the performance seems a
lot worse. This is using HP 366FLR which is just HP's version of Intel
i350 I believe.
Something odd
Hello,
I've upgraded from Stable 11 to Stable 12, and noticed that igb has been
removed and is now part of em driver. However, the performance seems a
lot worse. This is using HP 366FLR which is just HP's version of Intel
i350 I believe.
I've tried incorporating the sysctl settings I used
