Hi,
Am Montag, 15. November 2004 19:41 schrieb Paul Mather:
> On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 19:33 +0100, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
> > The extension of filesystems on concat plexes works (simply) as
> > advertised... :-) At least *I* had no problems so far.
>
> That's encouraging to hear! Can you sh
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 07:33:36PM +0100, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
> Am Montag, 15. November 2004 18:25 schrieb Paul Mather:
> > [...]
> > I don't know if growfs is 100% robust enough yet to provide the other
> > important ingredient to a true LVM storage management system a la the
> > logica
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 19:33 +0100, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, 15. November 2004 18:25 schrieb Paul Mather:
> > [...]
> > I don't know if growfs is 100% robust enough yet to provide the other
> > important ingredient to a true LVM storage management system a la the
> > logi
Hi,
Am Montag, 15. November 2004 18:25 schrieb Paul Mather:
> [...]
> I don't know if growfs is 100% robust enough yet to provide the other
> important ingredient to a true LVM storage management system a la the
> logical volume manager on AIX or AdvFS on Tru64, say.
Yes, it is. I use (g)vinum pr
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 02:31 -0500, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 01:26:54 -0500, Paul Mather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Your observation is correct: it doesn't (yet) load balance across plexes
> > of mirrored volumes; geom_mirror (gmirror) does, though (and offers
> > variou
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 01:26:54 -0500, Paul Mather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your observation is correct: it doesn't (yet) load balance across plexes
> of mirrored volumes; geom_mirror (gmirror) does, though (and offers
> various load-balancing options).
Is this something planned for the near fut
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 00:36 -0500, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> I'm looking at gstat while fsck'ing a gvinum partition. The trouble
> I'm seeing is that I don't see activity on the second disk. Now...
> I'm using fsck -n ... just checking things ... so there's no writes,
> but does gvinum not (yet)
I'm looking at gstat while fsck'ing a gvinum partition. The trouble
I'm seeing is that I don't see activity on the second disk. Now...
I'm using fsck -n ... just checking things ... so there's no writes,
but does gvinum not (yet) load balance on reads?
