On 2010-Nov-28 02:24:21 -0600, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org wrote:
Since all the boinc processes are running at i31, why are they impacting
a buildkernel that runs with 0 nicety?
With the setup you presented
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org wrote:
Since all the boinc processes are running at i31, why are they impacting
a buildkernel that runs with 0 nicety?
Someone please enlighten me if I'm wrong, but I'll take a stab at it.
With the setup you presented you're
Since scheduler issues have been popular lately, I thought I'd
investigate a ULE issue I've been aware of for a while...
I normally have some boinc (ports/astro/boinc) applications running
and I'd noticed that my nightly builds appear to end much sooner when
there's no boinc work units (this has
